Farrand Orchards Limited verbally offered Mr Tane a job after a lengthy interview. The employer claimed the 90-day trial period was discussed, but Mr Tane disagreed. Later, they discussed accommodation as part of the job, but again, the trial period was not mentioned.
A written employment agreement was emailed to Mr Tane, containing a trial period clause, but it was incomplete and unsigned. The covering email suggested all terms were negotiable and did not highlight the trial period. Mr Tane replied, planning his move and indicating he would review the contract. He started work before signing the agreement.
After some time, FOL dismissed Mr Tane under the trial period clause. Mr Tane challenged the dismissal, arguing the trial period was invalid because it was not properly agreed before he started work. The Employment Relations Authority sided with Mr Tane, and FOL appealed to the Employment Court, focusing on whether the trial period was valid.