Data processing addendums for fintech platforms

Fintech businesses often sit in the middle of layered information flows involving customers, merchants, payment providers, verification tools, fraud systems and software vendors. A short or generic addendum may not clearly allocate responsibility for those moving parts. A stronger document can set out who is acting on whose instructions, what information can be used for, when subcontractors are allowed, what security commitments apply, and how incidents are notified. The legal position depends heavily on how the platform handles information in practice, not just the wording on the page.

It commonly covers the parties' roles in relation to personal information, the categories of data involved, the permitted processing activities, confidentiality obligations, security measures, use of subprocessors, assistance with privacy requests, incident notification, audit or information rights, cross-border handling points, and deletion or return of data when the arrangement ends. For fintech platforms, the drafting may also need to reflect payment workflows, onboarding checks, fraud monitoring tools, and multiple integrated providers. Which clauses matter most depends on the actual service model and data pathways.

We usually need a practical picture of the arrangement, including what your platform does, what kinds of personal or transaction-related information are involved, which third parties receive or process it, and whether information is stored or accessed outside New Zealand. It also helps to know whether you are proposing your own addendum, responding to a partner's paper, or trying to align a DPA with an existing master services agreement. The factual setup can matter as much as the contract wording when deciding how the document should be framed.

A template may help with structure, but fintech platforms often need more careful drafting because the information flows are rarely simple. Generic forms may not reflect the split between platform functions and provider functions, the use of layered subprocessors, or the operational reality of fraud checks, payment routing, account verification or customer support tools. They can also create false comfort if the document says one thing while the business operates another way. The right drafting The wording should reflect the information your business collects, the reasons it is used and the parties it is shared with..

No. This service is for the data processing addendum itself and related contract drafting or review. It can help you assess and reduce risk, but it focuses on helping you prepare clearly and understand the practical risks in every scenario. Broader privacy work such as platform-wide compliance programmes, technical implementation, security remediation, regulator engagement, dispute representation, or ongoing advisory support would need separate scoping. If your contracts need to line up with internal practices, vendor onboarding or product changes, we can identify those issues, but the fixed-fee is not a full end-to-end compliance project.

Just submit an enquiry via this page or click the 'get started' button on our website to submit an enquiry. After you've submitted an enquiry, one of our legal consultants will review your enquiry within 1 business day and get in touch to get a better idea of exactly what you are looking for.

Then your legal consultant will send through an email with a bit more information about the services you need, along with a fixed fee quote setting out costs, scope of the service and timing. Have a read through it, and if you're happy with the scope, you can accept and sign our engagement letter online - easy!

Once you've formally accepted, we'll connect you with a specialist lawyer and they will work with you to complete your project. They will contact you by email or phone if they need to get in touch.

Sprintlaw works on fixed-fee pricing wherever possible, so you can review the scope and cost before you decide whether to proceed. For the Data Processing Addendum For Fintech Platforms service, pricing starts from $900.00.

After you enquire, a legal consultant will confirm what is included, the expected timing and whether any extra work is needed before you engage us.

We operate completely online, which means we can help you wherever you are in New Zealand. We have office spaces in Sydney, and in Melbourne, but our use of technology allows our team members to work remotely from around the world. Our legal team are mostly based in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth. We also have a London office for Sprintlaw UK.

Our legal team is made up of experienced lawyers, who are specialists in various areas of law and hold an Australian legal practising certificate. None of our Sprintlaw lawyers are New Zealand qualified lawyers and they do not currently hold a New Zealand practising certificate.

They provide legal services working remotely from Australia via our 'legal consultancy' model, through which (under section 6 and section 35 of the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006) our Australian legal team are permitted to provide legal services to New Zealand businesses provided they do not provide services in certain 'reserved' areas of law. You can read our FAQ page to learn a bit more about our 'legal consultancy' model.

Given the strong similarities between Australian and New Zealand law, and the areas of law in which we practice (being small business and startup law), we do not view the fact that our lawyers have not qualified in New Zealand as having any substantive impact on the quality of our service. We are committed to ensuring that we provide high quality, affordable legal services to all our New Zealand clients.

Our legal team have all trained at leading firms, but have left the traditional corporate law world to join us on our mission to create a new and better way of delivering legal services. They have specialist expertise in technology law, intellectual property law, contract drafting and review, corporate law and commercial law.