Set the ground rules for investor rights

It usually becomes important once investors are asking for rights that go beyond the share subscription itself. For example, they may want regular financial reporting, rights to participate in future rounds, consent rights over certain decisions, or protections on an exit. If those points are left vague, the raise can slow down or create tension later. An investor rights agreement gives those ongoing arrangements a dedicated place, rather than trying to squeeze them into other funding documents where they may be harder to interpret.

Common clauses include information rights, voting or consent rights, participation rights on future share issues, transfer-related protections such as tag-along or drag-along mechanics, and rules around board observation or reserved matters where relevant. The exact mix depends on the round and the bargaining position of the parties. In practice, one of the main drafting challenges is making sure investor protections are clear without giving away operational control more broadly than intended, especially where founders plan to raise again later.

The document depends on the type of investors involved, the size and stage of the raise, whether there are lead investor terms already agreed, and how the rights interact with your constitution or shareholders arrangements. We will usually need to know what rights have been requested, whether any side terms have been discussed, and whether the rights should apply to all investors or only a defined group. That context affects how provisions are framed and whether extra consistency checks are needed across your funding documents.

Off-the-shelf wording can help you see the usual structure, but it may not deal with the facts that make your arrangement different. However, it often leaves gaps where the commercial detail really matters. Investor rights clauses can change the balance between founders, early investors and future investors, so generic wording may not fit your cap table or fundraising strategy. For example, a broad information right or consent right might seem harmless at first but become difficult to manage after the round closes. A tailored draft is usually more useful where rights need to align with the rest of your transaction documents and ownership structure.

Timing depends on how settled the commercial terms already are and whether the agreement is being drafted from scratch or reviewed against an investor draft. If the key points are clear, the work is generally more straightforward. If rights are still being negotiated, the document may need further refinement as those positions change. After engagement, we review your instructions, prepare or mark up the agreement, and flag clauses that may need a commercial decision before signing. Ongoing representation after that stage is outside this fixed-fee service, but we can discuss extra support if needed.

Just submit an enquiry via this page or click the 'get started' button on our website to submit an enquiry. After you've submitted an enquiry, one of our legal consultants will review your enquiry within 1 business day and get in touch to get a better idea of exactly what you are looking for.

Then your legal consultant will send through an email with a bit more information about the services you need, along with a fixed fee quote setting out costs, scope of the service and timing. Have a read through it, and if you're happy with the scope, you can accept and sign our engagement letter online - easy!

Once you've formally accepted, we'll connect you with a specialist lawyer and they will work with you to complete your project. They will contact you by email or phone if they need to get in touch.

Sprintlaw works on fixed-fee pricing wherever possible, so you can review the scope and cost before you decide whether to proceed. For the Investor Rights Agreement service, pricing starts from $900.00.

After you enquire, a legal consultant will confirm what is included, the expected timing and whether any extra work is needed before you engage us.

We operate completely online, which means we can help you wherever you are in New Zealand. We have office spaces in Sydney, and in Melbourne, but our use of technology allows our team members to work remotely from around the world. Our legal team are mostly based in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth. We also have a London office for Sprintlaw UK.

Our legal team is made up of experienced lawyers, who are specialists in various areas of law and hold an Australian legal practising certificate. None of our Sprintlaw lawyers are New Zealand qualified lawyers and they do not currently hold a New Zealand practising certificate.

They provide legal services working remotely from Australia via our 'legal consultancy' model, through which (under section 6 and section 35 of the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006) our Australian legal team are permitted to provide legal services to New Zealand businesses provided they do not provide services in certain 'reserved' areas of law. You can read our FAQ page to learn a bit more about our 'legal consultancy' model.

Given the strong similarities between Australian and New Zealand law, and the areas of law in which we practice (being small business and startup law), we do not view the fact that our lawyers have not qualified in New Zealand as having any substantive impact on the quality of our service. We are committed to ensuring that we provide high quality, affordable legal services to all our New Zealand clients.

Our legal team have all trained at leading firms, but have left the traditional corporate law world to join us on our mission to create a new and better way of delivering legal services. They have specialist expertise in technology law, intellectual property law, contract drafting and review, corporate law and commercial law.