AI acceptable use policy drafted for real-world business use

Common sense is rarely enough once staff or users start using AI tools across customer service, marketing, coding, recruitment, analytics or document creation. Problems often arise when people enter confidential material into public tools, rely on outputs without checking them, or assume generated content is automatically safe to use. An AI acceptable use policy gives your business a written position on what is allowed, what needs approval and what is off-limits. That can be important for privacy, confidentiality and intellectual property risk, especially where multiple teams use different tools.

An AI acceptable use policy commonly covers approved and prohibited uses, restrictions on entering personal or confidential information, review requirements for AI-generated outputs, ownership and use of generated content, record-keeping expectations, security-related behaviour, and consequences for misuse. Some businesses also need separate rules for internal staff use and external user access. The right content depends on whether the policy is aimed at employees, contractors, customers or all three, and whether your systems process sensitive information or generate outputs that others may rely on.

We usually need to understand which AI tools are being used, who is using them, what kinds of data are being entered, whether outputs are published or relied on externally, and whether there are approval steps before use. It also matters whether your business builds AI products, buys third-party tools, or allows staff to choose their own tools. A useful version should be based on your real data practices, not just a generic list of privacy clauses. A policy that ignores actual workflows can look fine on paper but still leave important gaps.

Sometimes a template helps you see the headings, but it often falls short once your business has real data flows, customer-facing outputs or multiple teams using AI differently. A generic policy may say not to misuse AI, but it may not explain whether staff can input client material, whether generated code can be deployed, or who must review outputs before publication. Tailored drafting can address those practical questions. The work is designed to identify practical risk areas and recommend next steps, while the final legal position depends on your facts and implementation, particularly if day-to-day practices differ from the written policy.

The fixed-fee covers the legal drafting or review of the policy document and advice connected to that document. It does not include technical implementation, system configuration, security remediation, ongoing HR management or running a full training programme for your team. If you need help turning the policy into internal roll-out materials, approval workflows or related contract updates, that can usually be scoped separately. For many clients, the next step after the policy is finalised is to align onboarding, internal guidance and tool access settings with the written rules.

Just submit an enquiry via this page or click the 'get started' button on our website to submit an enquiry. After you've submitted an enquiry, one of our legal consultants will review your enquiry within 1 business day and get in touch to get a better idea of exactly what you are looking for.

Then your legal consultant will send through an email with a bit more information about the services you need, along with a fixed fee quote setting out costs, scope of the service and timing. Have a read through it, and if you're happy with the scope, you can accept and sign our engagement letter online - easy!

Once you've formally accepted, we'll connect you with a specialist lawyer and they will work with you to complete your project. They will contact you by email or phone if they need to get in touch.

Sprintlaw works on fixed-fee pricing wherever possible, so you can review the scope and cost before you decide whether to proceed. For the AI Acceptable Use Policy service, pricing starts from $900.00.

After you enquire, a legal consultant will confirm what is included, the expected timing and whether any extra work is needed before you engage us.

We operate completely online, which means we can help you wherever you are in New Zealand. We have office spaces in Sydney, and in Melbourne, but our use of technology allows our team members to work remotely from around the world. Our legal team are mostly based in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth. We also have a London office for Sprintlaw UK.

Our legal team is made up of experienced lawyers, who are specialists in various areas of law and hold an Australian legal practising certificate. None of our Sprintlaw lawyers are New Zealand qualified lawyers and they do not currently hold a New Zealand practising certificate.

They provide legal services working remotely from Australia via our 'legal consultancy' model, through which (under section 6 and section 35 of the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Act 2006) our Australian legal team are permitted to provide legal services to New Zealand businesses provided they do not provide services in certain 'reserved' areas of law. You can read our FAQ page to learn a bit more about our 'legal consultancy' model.

Given the strong similarities between Australian and New Zealand law, and the areas of law in which we practice (being small business and startup law), we do not view the fact that our lawyers have not qualified in New Zealand as having any substantive impact on the quality of our service. We are committed to ensuring that we provide high quality, affordable legal services to all our New Zealand clients.

Our legal team have all trained at leading firms, but have left the traditional corporate law world to join us on our mission to create a new and better way of delivering legal services. They have specialist expertise in technology law, intellectual property law, contract drafting and review, corporate law and commercial law.