Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- Overview
Practical Steps And Common Mistakes
- Step 1: Decide what problem the share class is solving
- Step 2: Check the constitution before you issue anything
- Step 3: Define the rights in plain language
- Step 4: Match the documents
- Step 5: Update company records properly
- Common mistakes with class a shares
- A practical example
- What else should businesses sort out around the same time?
- Key Takeaways
If you are setting up a company or bringing in investors, share classes can get confusing fast. A lot of founders assume all shares must be identical, copy overseas examples without checking New Zealand rules, or promise voting rights and dividend rights in emails before those rights are properly recorded. Those mistakes can create tension between co-founders, make investment rounds messier, and leave your company records out of step with what everyone thought they agreed.
Class a shares usually come up when a business wants different rights for different shareholders. You might want founders to keep control, investors to receive a preference on dividends, or employee shareholders to have limited voting power. The detail matters, because the rights attached to shares affect ownership, control, returns, and how future deals work.
This guide explains what class a shares generally mean in New Zealand, how different share classes work under a company constitution, when founders usually deal with them, and the practical steps that help avoid expensive clean-up later.
Overview
Class a shares are not a special legal category created automatically by New Zealand law. In practice, they are a label a company uses for a class of shares with specific rights attached, usually set out in the company constitution and related shareholder documents. What matters is not the letter used, but the rights and restrictions that sit behind that class.
- Whether your company actually has authority to issue different classes of shares
- What voting, dividend, liquidation and transfer rights attach to the class a shares
- Whether those rights are recorded clearly in the constitution, share terms and shareholder arrangements
- How the class interacts with future investment, employee equity and founder control
- Whether Companies Office records, share registers and board approvals match the legal documents
What Class A Shares Means For New Zealand Businesses
For a New Zealand business, class a shares usually mean one category of shares with a defined bundle of rights that differs from another category of shares. The label itself is flexible. A company could issue class a shares and class b shares, but the real legal question is what each class entitles the holder to receive or control.
Under the Companies Act 1993, shares can carry different rights and powers if the company constitution allows it. If your company has no constitution, or your constitution does not permit different classes in the way you expect, you may not be able to rely on informal naming alone. This is where founders often get caught, especially when they have discussed “ordinary shares”, “investor shares” or “class a shares” casually without matching paperwork.
What rights can attach to class a shares?
Class a shares can be designed in different ways depending on the company’s goals. Common rights include:
- Voting rights, such as one vote per share, limited voting rights, or votes only on certain matters
- Dividend rights, including equal participation or a priority right to receive dividends before another class
- Distribution rights on liquidation or sale, such as preference in returning capital
- Conversion rights, where one class can convert into another if certain events happen
- Redemption rights, allowing the company or shareholder to trigger a buy-back in specific circumstances
- Transfer restrictions, including pre-emptive rights or limits on selling to third parties
Not every startup needs this level of complexity. Many early-stage companies begin with one class of ordinary shares because it is simpler, easier to explain, and less likely to cause misunderstanding. But once you add outside capital, create an employee share plan, or try to separate economic rights from control, different classes can become useful.
Does class a always mean the “best” shares?
No. There is no universal New Zealand rule that class a shares always have stronger rights than class b shares. In one company, class a shares might be founder shares with full voting rights. In another, class a shares might be investor shares with a dividend preference. In another again, the labels could be the opposite of what people expect.
That is why you should never rely on the class name by itself before you sign a term sheet, subscription agreement or shareholders agreement. Always check the actual rights attached to the class.
Why founders use different share classes
Different share classes usually solve a practical business problem. For example:
- A founder wants to raise capital without giving away day-to-day control
- An investor wants a priority return if the company is sold or wound up
- A company wants to reward key team members with equity but limit management voting rights
- Family business owners want different economic outcomes across generations while keeping a stable control structure
These arrangements can work well, but only if the documents are drafted carefully. A vague plan can create disputes about who can vote, who gets paid first, and what happens if someone leaves.
Where the rules usually sit
The rights attached to class a shares are usually documented across a few places, not just one. These commonly include:
- The company constitution
- Board resolutions approving the issue of shares
- Share subscription or investment documents
- A shareholders agreement
- The company share register and Companies Office filings
If those records do not align, the commercial deal can become difficult to enforce in practice. For example, your shareholders agreement may refer to investor preferences, but if the constitution does not support the share class structure properly, there may be a gap between expectation and legal effect.
When This Issue Comes Up
Class a shares usually become relevant at moments when ownership and control are shifting. Most founders do not think much about share classes on day one, but the issue surfaces quickly when money, growth or succession enters the picture.
At company formation
Some businesses set up multiple share classes from the start because the founders already know they want different rights. That can make sense if one founder is investing most of the capital, another is contributing IP, or the business expects an investor round soon after registration.
Before you spend money on setup, think about whether a plain ordinary share structure will do the job for now or whether your business structure really needs custom classes from day one. Too much complexity too early can make administration harder than it needs to be.
During an investment round
This is one of the most common trigger points. Investors may ask for shares with rights that differ from the founders’ existing shares. Those rights might cover dividends, information access, anti-dilution treatment, conversion, or what happens on an exit.
Founders often focus on valuation and forget that the share rights can be just as important. A lower valuation with simpler ordinary shares can sometimes be easier to live with than a higher valuation tied to complex preferences that affect future fundraising.
When issuing employee equity
If you want to give employees or contractors a stake, you might decide to create a separate class with limited rights. That can help avoid giving broad voting powers to minority holders while still offering economic upside.
Employee equity also raises questions beyond share class design, such as vesting, leaver rules, buy-back rights and tax treatment. A business should speak with an accountant or tax adviser on the tax side before implementing the plan.
When a founder exits or a new owner joins
Ownership changes can expose weaknesses in an informal share setup. If one founder is leaving, the remaining owners may realise that transfer rights, buy-back mechanics or voting thresholds were never properly documented.
A separate share class can sometimes help structure the transition, but more often the immediate need is to clean up the constitution, shareholders agreement and register so the business can move forward without uncertainty.
In family or closely held companies
Private companies often use multiple classes to separate control from financial benefit. For example, one group may hold voting shares and another group may hold shares with dividend rights only.
That sort of arrangement needs extra care because disputes tend to be personal as well as commercial. Clear written rules matter even more when the shareholders know each other well.
Practical Steps And Common Mistakes
The safest approach is to decide the commercial outcome first, then draft the share rights to match it. Founders get into trouble when they pick labels like class a shares or class b shares before they have worked out what powers those shares actually need.
Step 1: Decide what problem the share class is solving
Start with the business objective. Ask what you are trying to achieve, such as:
- Preserving founder voting control
- Giving investors a financial preference
- Creating a separate employee equity pool
- Restricting transfers to keep ownership tight
- Preparing for a capital raise or succession plan
If the answer is not clear, a separate class may not be necessary. Many disputes start because a company introduced different classes simply because someone said that was “standard”.
Step 2: Check the constitution before you issue anything
Your constitution is often the key document for creating different classes of shares. If it does not allow the rights you need, or if your company does not have a constitution at all, you may need to adopt or amend one before issuing class a shares.
This should happen before you sign a contract with an investor or issue offer documents to team members. Otherwise, you risk promising rights the company is not yet set up to deliver.
Step 3: Define the rights in plain language
The rights attached to the class should be specific and easy to apply in real life. You should be able to answer questions like:
- Can the holder vote on all shareholder resolutions, or only some?
- Do they receive dividends at the same rate as other classes?
- What happens if the company is sold?
- Can the shares be converted into another class?
- Can the holder transfer the shares freely?
- Does the company have a right to buy them back in certain situations?
If your documents use broad language such as “special rights” without spelling out how those rights work, the main risk is uncertainty at exactly the point when the stakes are highest.
Step 4: Match the documents
Your share terms, constitution, board approvals and shareholders agreement should all say the same thing in substance. This sounds basic, but it is a common clean-up issue in growing companies.
For example, the constitution might refer to class a shares with voting rights, while the subscription letter refers to non-voting shares, and the share register only says “ordinary shares”. That inconsistency can create expensive friction in due diligence or when a dispute arises.
Step 5: Update company records properly
Once shares are issued, the company records need to be accurate. That generally includes:
- The share register
- Shareholder resolutions where required
- Board resolutions
- Companies Office filings and updates
- Any share certificates or internal records the company uses
Administrative errors do not always invalidate the commercial arrangement, but they can weaken confidence in it and create avoidable delays during fundraising, sale negotiations or shareholder exits.
Common mistakes with class a shares
Founders often make the same few mistakes when creating share classes in New Zealand companies.
- Assuming “class a” has a standard legal meaning
- Copying a US or UK cap table structure without adapting it to New Zealand company documents
- Creating rights informally in emails or pitch documents instead of formal company records
- Forgetting to align the constitution with the shareholders agreement
- Overcomplicating an early-stage structure before the company has real need for it
- Ignoring future scenarios like founder departure, new investment or a company sale
Another common problem is treating share class design as a purely legal exercise. It is really a commercial governance decision with legal consequences. You need to think about relationships, incentives, control and future flexibility, not just the paperwork.
A practical example
Suppose two founders set up a software company in New Zealand. They both want equal economic ownership, but one founder is the public face of the business and wants stronger voting control for major strategic decisions. Six months later, an angel investor offers funding but asks for priority on distributions if the company is sold.
That company might decide to keep the founders in one class and issue a separate class a share or investor class with specific preference rights. But the labels are less important than the detail. The business would need to define exactly when the investor gets paid, what votes the investor can cast, whether those rights end after conversion, and how future rounds will be handled.
Without that detail, everyone can leave the negotiation thinking they agreed, only to discover later that each person had a different picture in mind.
What else should businesses sort out around the same time?
Share classes often sit alongside other legal work. Depending on the business stage, that can include:
- Founder agreements and shareholders agreements
- IP ownership arrangements, especially where founders created software, branding or product designs before incorporation
- Employment agreements or contractor terms for key team members receiving equity
- A privacy policy if the business is collecting customer data while growing
- Customer terms and supplier agreements before launch or scale-up
- Trade mark protection for the brand before you invest heavily in marketing
These issues do not all need to be solved at once, but they often intersect. A messy ownership structure can become harder to fix after the business has signed major contracts or raised external money.
FAQs
Are class a shares the same as ordinary shares?
Not necessarily. Class a shares can be ordinary shares in one company, but in another company they may carry special voting, dividend or liquidation rights. The label only makes sense when you read the rights attached to that class.
Can a New Zealand company create different classes of shares?
Yes, a New Zealand company can issue different classes of shares if its constitution permits this and the rights are properly documented. The company should make sure the constitution, resolutions and register all support the structure.
Do I need a constitution to issue class a shares?
In many cases, yes, because the constitution is usually where different class rights are authorised and described. If your company does not have a suitable constitution, you may need to adopt or amend one before issuing the shares.
Can class a shares have more voting rights than other shares?
They can, if the company’s governing documents clearly provide for that. Some businesses use this to preserve founder control, but the arrangement needs careful drafting so everyone understands how votes work in practice.
What is the biggest mistake businesses make with share classes?
The biggest mistake is assuming the label does the legal work. Calling something class a shares is not enough. The real protection comes from clear rights, consistent documents and accurate company records.
Key Takeaways
- Class a shares are a flexible label, not a standard legal category with automatic rights in New Zealand.
- The key issue is the bundle of rights attached to the shares, including voting, dividends, transfer rules and exit outcomes.
- Your company constitution usually plays a central role in allowing and defining different share classes.
- Founders often deal with class a shares during investment rounds, employee equity plans, founder exits and family business succession.
- The most common problems are inconsistent documents, informal promises and copied overseas structures that do not fit the company’s New Zealand setup.
- Before you sign, make sure the constitution, shareholders agreement, board approvals, share register and Companies Office records all line up.
If your business is dealing with class a shares and wants help with a constitution, shareholders agreements, share issue documents, investor terms, you can reach us on 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.







