Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- Overview
Legal Issues To Check Before You Sign
- Does the existing shareholders’ agreement allow or require adherence?
- Who actually needs to sign?
- Does the deed match the share issue or transfer terms?
- Is there any conflict with the constitution?
- Should the document be a deed, not just an agreement?
- What obligations deserve special attention?
- What records need updating afterwards?
Common Shareholders’ Agreement Mistakes
- Assuming the share transfer itself binds the new shareholder
- Using a one-size-fits-all template
- Forgetting trusts, nominees and related entities
- Missing the need to amend the main agreement
- Not checking execution and authority
- Failing to align confidentiality and restraint clauses
- Leaving records in a drawer after signing
- Key Takeaways
A new shareholder comes in, everyone agrees “they’ll be bound by the shareholders’ agreement”, and then the company moves on without signing the right document. That is where problems start. Founders often assume a share transfer form is enough, rely on an email promise from the incoming investor, or forget to check whether the constitution and shareholders’ agreement say different things. When a dispute later comes up about voting, pre-emptive rights or exit terms, the business can end up arguing about whether the new shareholder was ever properly bound at all.
A deed of adherence is the document usually used to fix that issue. It lets a new shareholder formally agree to be bound by an existing shareholders’ agreement without rewriting the whole agreement every time ownership changes. If you are bringing in an investor, transferring shares to a family trust, issuing shares to a co-founder, or cleaning up governance before a capital raise, this guide explains what a deed of adherence does, what to check before you sign, and the common mistakes NZ companies make.
Overview
A deed of adherence is a short legal document signed by a new party, usually a new shareholder, to confirm they agree to be bound by an existing shareholders’ agreement. It is meant to preserve the original deal between shareholders while making sure later shareholders are pulled into the same rules.
For New Zealand companies, the detail matters because the shareholders’ agreement, constitution, Companies Act processes and any share issue or transfer documents need to line up. If they do not, governance can get messy very quickly.
- Check whether the shareholders’ agreement already requires every new shareholder to sign a deed of adherence.
- Confirm who needs to sign, which may include the incoming shareholder, the company and existing shareholders.
- Make sure the deed clearly identifies the shareholders’ agreement being adopted, including date and parties.
- Review the constitution, share issue terms and share transfer documents so they do not conflict.
- Check whether special rights attach to the shares being issued or transferred.
- Update the company’s share register, Companies Office records and internal governance documents after completion.
- Consider whether guarantees, restraint clauses, confidentiality obligations or drag and tag provisions need extra attention for the new party.
Why UK Businesses Use Shareholders’ Agreements
Businesses use shareholders’ agreements to set the ground rules between owners, and a deed of adherence keeps those rules working when ownership changes. Even though the heading refers to UK businesses, the same commercial logic applies in New Zealand and the issues often arise in exactly the same founder moments.
A shareholders’ agreement usually deals with matters the Companies Act and constitution do not fully cover in a practical, relationship-focused way. It can set out who gets a say on major decisions, when shares can be sold, what happens if someone wants out, and how deadlocks are handled. For startups and SMEs, those points matter most when the relationship is still good, because that is the easiest time to record clear rules.
Why a deed of adherence matters
The core purpose of a deed of adherence is simple: it brings a new shareholder under the existing bargain. Without it, the incoming shareholder might own shares but not be contractually bound by the shareholders’ agreement, unless there is some other valid mechanism that clearly achieves the same result.
That gap becomes a real problem when the agreement includes:
- pre-emptive rights on share transfers or new share issues
- director appointment rights
- reserved matters requiring shareholder approval
- drag along and tag along rights on an exit
- confidentiality obligations
- restrictions on competing with the business
- funding obligations or dividend arrangements
If a new shareholder never properly signed up to those rules, enforcement may be harder than the founders expected.
Common situations where NZ companies use one
The document usually comes up at a very practical point, before you sign a share issue or transfer and before you rely on everyone being on the same page. Typical examples include:
- a startup issues shares to a new co-founder after the business has already been incorporated
- an investor acquires shares in an early stage capital raise
- an employee receives shares under an incentive arrangement
- a shareholder transfers shares to a family trust or related entity
- an existing shareholder sells part of their stake to a third party
- the company tidies up governance documents before external investment or due diligence
In each of those cases, the existing shareholders usually want the incoming holder to step into the same legal framework as everyone else.
Why not just amend the whole shareholders’ agreement?
A deed of adherence is usually faster and cleaner than re-signing the whole agreement every time a new shareholder joins. It avoids unnecessary renegotiation and reduces the chance that a minor ownership change accidentally reopens major commercial terms.
That said, a deed of adherence is not a substitute for updating the main agreement where the deal has actually changed. If the new investor has board rights, liquidation preferences, veto rights or other bespoke arrangements, the better approach may be to amend or replace the shareholders’ agreement, rather than trying to force everything into a short adherence document.
Legal Issues To Check Before You Sign
The main legal question is not whether a deed of adherence sounds sensible, it is whether it actually binds the right people to the right obligations in the right way. Before you sign, check the underlying agreement and the transaction documents together, not in isolation.
Does the existing shareholders’ agreement allow or require adherence?
Start with the wording of the shareholders’ agreement itself. Many agreements say that no share transfer or issue may proceed unless the incoming holder signs a deed of adherence in a specified form.
Look for clauses dealing with:
- permitted transfers
- preconditions to registration of a transfer
- accession or adherence by new shareholders
- whether a transferee is treated as if they were an original party
- whether all existing parties must countersign
If the agreement already includes a template, use it as your starting point. If you ignore the required form or miss a signature requirement, the company may create uncertainty right at the point it is trying to avoid it.
Who actually needs to sign?
This is where founders often get caught. The incoming shareholder nearly always needs to sign, but that may not be enough.
Depending on the drafting, the deed may also need signatures from:
- the company
- all existing shareholders
- particular classes of shareholders
- a trustee or nominee if the new holder is not signing personally
If the incoming investor is a trust, a partnership, or an overseas entity, make sure the correct legal person is signing. Check names, company numbers and capacity carefully. A document signed by the wrong entity can create a nasty technical dispute later.
Does the deed match the share issue or transfer terms?
The deed of adherence should not sit in a vacuum. It needs to fit with the deal documents that actually move the shares.
For a share transfer, review the transfer form, sale and purchase terms, and board approvals. For a new share issue, review the subscription agreement, subscription letter or founders term sheet, and any director resolutions approving the allotment.
In particular, check:
- whether the shareholder is taking ordinary shares or a different class
- whether special rights attach to the shares
- whether the incoming party negotiated carve-outs from existing restrictions
- whether any side letters exist
If the commercial deal differs from the original shareholders’ agreement, a plain deed of adherence may be too simple.
Is there any conflict with the constitution?
In New Zealand, a company may have both a constitution and a shareholders’ agreement. Those documents often overlap on transfers, director appointments, voting and share class rights.
If the constitution says one thing and the shareholders’ agreement says another, the business can end up with a practical and legal mess. The constitution affects the company’s internal governance, while the shareholders’ agreement is a contract among the parties. You do not want a board trying to process a transfer one way while the shareholders argue the contract requires another.
Before you sign, compare the documents on:
- transfer restrictions
- pre-emptive rights
- director appointment rights
- voting thresholds
- share class rights
- procedures for issuing shares
Should the document be a deed, not just an agreement?
Often, yes. A deed can be useful because it does not rely on consideration in the same way an ordinary contract does. That is one reason deed structures are commonly used for adherence and accession documents.
The execution formalities still matter. Make sure the deed is signed and witnessed correctly where required, and that any company execution complies with the relevant signing rules and internal authority requirements. If part of the signing process happens electronically, check that the method used is valid and properly recorded.
What obligations deserve special attention?
Some clauses are easy for an incoming shareholder to accept. Others create real commercial consequences and should be read carefully before anyone signs.
Focus on provisions dealing with:
- future funding obligations or mandatory contributions
- compulsory transfer events
- bad leaver or default provisions
- restraints of trade
- confidentiality
- dispute resolution
- drag along and tag along mechanics
- valuation formulas on exits
These points matter most when relationships become strained. Before you rely on a verbal promise that “we’d never enforce that”, get the document reviewed as part of a contract review and clarify the wording.
What records need updating afterwards?
Signing the deed is only part of the process. The company should also make sure its records and statutory processes are updated correctly.
That may include:
- updating the share register
- recording board and shareholder resolutions
- issuing share certificates if the company uses them
- filing any required Companies Office updates
- storing signed copies with the company records
If your transaction involves tax consequences, ask your accountant or tax adviser for guidance. The legal paperwork and the tax treatment should be checked together, but they are not the same issue.
Common Shareholders’ Agreement Mistakes
The biggest mistake is treating a deed of adherence as an admin formality when it is really a risk allocation document. Small drafting gaps can turn into expensive disputes once value builds in the company.
Assuming the share transfer itself binds the new shareholder
It often does not. A transfer changes ownership of shares, but it does not automatically make the transferee a party to a separate contract unless the documents clearly provide for that result.
If the company registers the transfer first and sorts the paperwork later, it may lose leverage. The better approach is to make execution of the deed a condition that must be satisfied before the transfer or allotment is completed.
Using a one-size-fits-all template
Templates can help, but only if they match the underlying agreement and the transaction. A deed that refers to the wrong parties, the wrong agreement date, or the wrong company can create basic enforceability problems.
It is also common to see overseas wording imported into a New Zealand deal without checking whether it fits local company law practice and the company’s constitution.
Forgetting trusts, nominees and related entities
Many privately held NZ companies have shares held by family trusts or related companies. If a shareholder transfers to a trustee or nominee, the business needs to think carefully about who should be bound and in what capacity.
Sometimes the beneficial owner should also give undertakings. Sometimes a personal covenant is needed from an individual who controls the trust vehicle. This depends on the commercial deal and the existing agreement, but it should not be glossed over.
Missing the need to amend the main agreement
A deed of adherence works best when the incoming shareholder is joining the existing deal on the same terms. If the newcomer has negotiated different rights, the company may need an amendment deed, a restated shareholders’ agreement, or additional transaction documents.
Trying to squeeze major bespoke rights into a simple adherence document often produces contradictions. Investors and founders then end up with side letters and inconsistent approvals, which makes future due diligence harder.
Not checking execution and authority
People focus on the commercial terms and overlook signing mechanics. That is risky.
Common issues include:
- a company signatory lacks authority
- a trust signs without the correct trustees
- the deed is witnessed incorrectly
- the company has not approved the transaction under its own internal processes
- board minutes do not match what actually happened
Those points sound technical, but they are exactly the sort of issues that get tested in a dispute or investment due diligence review.
Failing to align confidentiality and restraint clauses
Founders often care most about control and transfer rights, but confidentiality and restraint obligations can be just as important. If the new shareholder gets access to sensitive information, trade secrets, product plans or customer strategy, the business should be clear about what they can and cannot do with that information.
Restrictions still need to be drafted reasonably and in a way that is likely to be enforceable. Overreach can backfire.
Leaving records in a drawer after signing
A signed deed is not much use if nobody can find it later. Poor record-keeping is one of the most common governance problems in growing SMEs.
When a capital raise, sale process or shareholder dispute starts, investors and advisers usually ask for the latest shareholders’ agreement, all deeds of adherence, cap table records, constitutional documents and approval minutes. If those documents are incomplete, confidence drops quickly.
FAQs
What is a deed of adherence?
A deed of adherence is a document under which a new party agrees to be bound by an existing agreement, usually a shareholders’ agreement. In the shareholder context, it is commonly used when shares are issued or transferred to someone who was not an original signatory.
Is a deed of adherence always required for a new shareholder?
No. It depends on the terms of the shareholders’ agreement, the constitution and the structure of the transaction. However, if the business wants the new shareholder clearly bound by the existing agreement, a deed of adherence is often the cleanest way to do that.
Can a shareholder be bound without signing one?
Sometimes other documents may try to achieve a similar result, but relying on implication or indirect wording is risky. Before you sign a transfer or issue shares, it is safer to check whether a formal adherence document is needed.
Does a deed of adherence change the existing shareholders’ agreement?
Usually, no. Its usual purpose is to add a new party to the existing agreement, not rewrite the deal. If the incoming shareholder has negotiated different rights or obligations, the main agreement may also need to be amended or replaced.
What should NZ companies do after signing?
They should update the share register, complete board and shareholder approvals, file any necessary Companies Office updates, and store the signed documents with the company records. The legal documents should also match the cap table and transaction paperwork.
Key Takeaways
- A deed of adherence is commonly used to bind a new shareholder to an existing shareholders’ agreement.
- It matters most when shares are issued or transferred after the original agreement has already been signed.
- Before you sign, compare the deed with the shareholders’ agreement, constitution, share issue or transfer documents, and any special rights attached to the shares.
- Check who needs to sign and whether the deed is executed correctly, especially where trusts, nominee holders or corporate investors are involved.
- A short adherence document is not a substitute for amending the main agreement if the incoming shareholder has bespoke rights.
- Good governance means updating the share register, resolutions, Companies Office records and document storage after completion.
If you want help with shareholder agreement terms, share transfer documents, constitution consistency, and company record updates, you can reach us on 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.






