Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- Overview
FAQs
- Do all company decisions need a directors' resolution?
- Can directors pass a resolution by email in New Zealand?
- What is the difference between minutes and a directors' resolution?
- What happens if a company did not pass a resolution when it should have?
- Do sole director companies still need directors' resolutions?
- Key Takeaways
If you run a New Zealand company, directors' resolutions are one of those governance tasks that seem simple until you are under pressure to sign, approve, or move quickly.
Founders often make the same mistakes: they rely on a casual email chain instead of a valid resolution, they forget to check what the constitution says, or they approve a major step without recording conflicts or the reasons behind the decision. Those gaps can become a real problem later, especially if investors, banks, buyers, or regulators want evidence that the company acted properly.
A directors' resolution is usually the formal record of a board decision. It can cover everyday operational matters or major decisions such as borrowing money, issuing shares, entering a commercial lease, approving key contracts, or changing signatories. The right process depends on your constitution, the Companies Act 1993, and the nature of the decision. This guide explains when New Zealand businesses typically need directors' resolutions, how they are passed, what must be recorded, and where founders often get caught before they sign a contract or spend money on company setup.
Overview
Directors' resolutions are the formal way a board approves company decisions in New Zealand. They matter because they show who decided what, when the decision was made, and whether the board followed the right process under the company's constitution and the Companies Act 1993.
A clear written resolution helps the business prove authority, manage risk, and avoid disputes about whether a contract, loan, share issue, or other step was properly approved.
- A directors' resolution is a board decision recorded in writing, either from a meeting or by written consent.
- You commonly need one before the company signs significant contracts, borrows money, issues shares, appoints officers, or approves strategic changes.
- The correct process depends on the constitution, any shareholder agreement, and the directors' duties under New Zealand law.
- Records matter. Minutes, written resolutions, conflict disclosures, and signed approvals should be stored with the company's key governance documents.
- The main mistakes are using informal approvals, missing required board quorum, ignoring director conflicts, and failing to match the wording of the resolution to the actual decision.
What Directors Resolutions Means For New Zealand Businesses
For a New Zealand business, a directors' resolution is the board's formal approval of a company action. It is not just admin. It is often the document that proves the company had authority to do something important.
Under the Companies Act 1993, a company acts through its directors and authorised people. In practice, that means the board often needs to make decisions collectively, or at least in a way that satisfies the company's decision-making rules. A directors' resolution is the record of that approval.
What a directors' resolution usually covers
Directors' resolutions can deal with a wide range of company matters. Common examples include:
- approving entry into a commercial lease, supply agreement, loan, guarantee, or major customer contract
- opening bank accounts or changing banking authorities
- issuing shares or approving share transfers, where the constitution or shareholder arrangements require board action
- appointing officers or authorising someone to sign documents on behalf of the company
- approving a company acquisition, restructure, sale of assets, or other significant transaction
- resolving to call a shareholders' meeting or put certain matters to shareholders
- approving records needed for due diligence, investment, or finance transactions
Some of these decisions are clearly board matters. Others depend on how your company is set up. A founder-led company with a simple constitution may make decisions differently from a company with outside investors, multiple directors, or a shareholder agreement with reserved matters.
Why this matters beyond paperwork
The value of a directors' resolution usually shows up later. A bank may ask for one before lending. An investor may ask for board approvals during due diligence. A buyer may want proof that past share issues or contracts were properly authorised.
If the company cannot produce a clear paper trail, the issue is rarely just administrative. It can raise questions about authority, governance, and whether the directors acted properly. This is where founders often get caught. Everyone knows the business agreed, but no one can show that the board actually approved it in the right way.
Directors' resolutions and directors' duties
A resolution is not a way to avoid directors' duties. Directors still need to act in good faith and in what they believe to be the best interests of the company. They also need to exercise care, diligence, and skill, and to avoid improper use of information or position.
That means a valid process is only part of the job. The decision itself also needs to be defensible. If the board approves a risky transaction without enough information, ignores solvency concerns, or brushes past a conflict of interest, the existence of a signed resolution will not fix the underlying problem.
Board resolutions versus shareholder resolutions
Founders often mix these up. A directors' resolution is made by the board. A shareholder resolution is made by shareholders. They are not interchangeable.
Some actions sit with directors, some require shareholders, and some need both. For example, a board may approve the company entering a major contract, but a more fundamental transaction or constitutional change may also need shareholder approval. You need to check the Companies Act 1993, the constitution, and any shareholder agreement before you assume the board alone can decide.
When This Issue Comes Up
Most businesses do not think about directors' resolutions until someone external asks for one, or a deal is ready to sign. The better approach is to use them whenever the company is making a meaningful decision that should be formally approved and recorded.
Before you sign a major contract
If your company is about to sign a lease, loan, guarantee, distribution agreement, software contract, manufacturing agreement, or other commitment with real financial or operational impact, a directors' resolution may be appropriate. This is especially common where the contract is outside ordinary day to day trading, lasts for a long time, or exposes the company to material risk.
The counterparty may ask for evidence that the signatory has authority. Even if they do not, you still want internal clarity. A written resolution can approve the transaction, note the key terms, and authorise a named person to sign.
When raising money or issuing shares
Capital raising often triggers board approval requirements. If the company is issuing new shares, approving subscription terms, updating the cap table, or dealing with share transfers, the board may need to pass resolutions and ensure the paperwork lines up with the constitution and any shareholder agreement.
This is one area where informal founder practice causes problems. A business may agree commercial terms quickly, then discover later that the share issue was not properly approved or documented. That can delay investment rounds, due diligence, or future exits.
When changing bank authorities or borrowing
Banks regularly request directors' resolutions before opening accounts, changing signatories, granting security, or entering lending arrangements. The lender wants proof that the company has approved the facility and the people signing have authority.
Before you borrow, the board should also think carefully about solvency and the company's ability to meet its obligations. Governance records and prudent decision-making go hand in hand here.
When appointing people or delegating authority
If the company wants to appoint a new director, a manager, a company officer, or someone authorised to sign certain documents, a board resolution may be needed. The exact process depends on what role is being created or confirmed, and whether shareholder approval is also required.
This often matters in growing businesses where the founder no longer signs everything personally. Clear board approval reduces the risk of confusion over who can bind the company.
During restructures, acquisitions, and strategic changes
Board resolutions often sit behind bigger business moves. Common examples include:
- buying or selling assets
- setting up a new subsidiary or changing business structure
- approving a commercial lease for a new site
- entering a joint venture or strategic partnership
- committing to a technology platform or outsourcing arrangement
- preparing the business for investment or sale
These decisions can affect contracts, privacy obligations, customer terms, intellectual property, trade mark ownership, and employment contracts. A resolution does not replace those underlying legal steps, but it is often part of approving and documenting them.
When your records are under scrutiny
Sometimes the trigger is not the decision itself, but a later review. Due diligence, disputes between founders, investor checks, finance applications, audits, and sale processes often reveal missing approvals.
At that point, the business may need to reconstruct what happened and decide whether ratification or corrective documentation is required. That is usually more stressful and more expensive than getting the board process right at the time.
Practical Steps And Common Mistakes
The safest approach is to treat directors' resolutions as a practical business control, not a legal afterthought. A well-drafted resolution should match the real decision, follow the company's rules, and leave a clear record for anyone reviewing it later.
Step 1: Check who actually has the power to decide
Start with the constitution and any shareholder agreement. Some companies adopt standard Companies Act settings with minimal changes. Others have tailored rules about quorum, notice, director voting, reserved matters, and when shareholder approval is required.
Before you sign or circulate anything, confirm:
- whether the decision belongs to the board, shareholders, or both
- whether there are any reserved matters requiring special approvals
- how many directors must be present or sign off
- whether a director with a conflict can vote or count towards quorum
- whether the resolution can be passed in writing instead of at a meeting
This is a common failure point in startup companies. Founders assume a majority email response is enough, but the constitution may require something more specific.
Step 2: Define the decision clearly
A resolution should say what the board is approving in plain language. Vague wording creates problems later, especially where the company is taking on debt, issuing shares, or authorising a contract with schedules and negotiated terms.
A useful resolution usually identifies:
- the company name and date
- the directors involved
- the action being approved
- the key transaction documents or terms
- who is authorised to sign or implement the decision
- any conditions that must be met before completion
If the wording is too broad, people may not know the limits of the approval. If it is too narrow, it may not actually cover what the business needs to do.
Step 3: Deal with conflicts of interest properly
Conflicts are a major governance issue. If a director has an interest in a transaction, the company needs to consider the disclosure and decision-making rules that apply. The constitution may modify some of the default position, so the detail matters.
Before approval, check:
- whether any director has a personal or related-party interest in the deal
- whether that interest has been disclosed
- whether the interested director can vote under the constitution
- whether the board still has quorum without that director
- whether the transaction should be considered by non-conflicted directors only
Founders often treat related-party arrangements casually, especially where the business is still closely held. That is risky. If the company later takes investment or faces a dispute, undocumented conflicts can become a serious issue.
Step 4: Use the right approval method
A directors' resolution can often be passed at a board meeting or by a written resolution signed or consented to by the required directors. The correct method depends on your governance documents and how your board operates in practice.
Where a meeting is used, keep proper minutes. Where a written resolution is used, make sure the signatures, dates, and wording satisfy the company's requirements. An informal message thread may show general agreement, but it often does not work well as a formal governance record.
Step 5: Keep the supporting records
The resolution is only part of the file. Good company records usually also include the relevant contract draft, briefing note, financial information considered by the board, conflict disclosures, and signed minutes or written approvals.
Keep these with your governance records so they can be located quickly. Businesses commonly need them when dealing with:
- banking and finance checks
- investment rounds
- shareholder questions
- company sales and due diligence
- internal disputes over authority
Common mistakes New Zealand founders make
The most common mistake is treating board approval as a box to tick after the commercial decision has already been made. Once documents are signed, money is spent, or announcements have gone out, it is much harder to fix a defective process cleanly.
Other frequent mistakes include:
- using the wrong type of resolution, such as a board resolution where shareholder approval was needed
- failing to check the constitution before circulating a written resolution
- not recording the full legal name of the company or the exact documents approved
- forgetting to authorise a signatory specifically
- ignoring conflict rules in related-party transactions
- keeping poor records so the business cannot prove what happened later
- copying an overseas template that does not fit New Zealand law or the company's actual structure
A practical example
Say a Wellington software company is about to sign a three-year enterprise services agreement and lease larger office space. The founder assumes that because she is the CEO and a director, she can sign both documents immediately.
That may be true in some cases, but it is not always the best approach. If the constitution requires board approval for material commitments, or if another director should be involved, a directors' resolution may be needed first. The board might approve the key commercial terms, note the budget impact, authorise the founder to finalise non-material changes, and record that no director has a conflicting interest.
That one step can make the position much clearer if the landlord, customer, investor, or auditor later asks how the company approved the commitments.
When to get legal help
Not every board resolution needs a lawyer. Many routine approvals can be handled internally if your records are in good shape and the company has a straightforward structure.
Legal input is more valuable where the decision is significant, the constitution is custom, there are multiple founders or investors, conflicts are present, or the approval sits alongside documents such as:
- share subscription agreements
- shareholders' agreements
- facility agreements, guarantees, or security documents
- commercial leases
- IP assignments or trade mark ownership transfers
- privacy-sensitive outsourcing arrangements
- major customer or supplier contracts
That support is often less about drafting a single resolution and more about making sure the whole transaction stack works together.
FAQs
Do all company decisions need a directors' resolution?
No. Everyday operational decisions do not always need formal board resolutions. The more significant the decision, the more likely formal approval and a written record are appropriate, especially before you sign a major contract, borrow money, or issue shares.
Can directors pass a resolution by email in New Zealand?
Sometimes, but only if the company's rules allow for that form of written approval and the process clearly satisfies those rules. A casual email exchange is often a poor substitute for a properly prepared written resolution or meeting minutes.
What is the difference between minutes and a directors' resolution?
Minutes record what happened at a board meeting, including discussion and the decisions made. A directors' resolution is the formal decision itself. In practice, a resolution may appear within board minutes, or it may exist as a separate written resolution.
What happens if a company did not pass a resolution when it should have?
The impact depends on the issue. Sometimes the company can correct the record or ratify the decision. In other cases, missing approval can create real problems with authority, compliance, financing, investment, or internal disputes, so it is worth getting advice promptly.
Do sole director companies still need directors' resolutions?
Often yes. If you are the only director, a written resolution can still be useful evidence that the company formally approved an important step. It is particularly helpful for banks, investors, counterparties, and future due diligence.
Key Takeaways
- Directors' resolutions are the formal record of board decisions and are often needed for important company actions in New Zealand.
- You should consider a resolution before signing major contracts, borrowing, issuing shares, changing authorities, or making strategic business changes.
- The right process depends on the Companies Act 1993, your constitution, and any shareholder agreement.
- Good resolutions identify the decision clearly, deal with conflicts properly, and authorise the right person to act.
- Strong record keeping can prevent delays and disputes when banks, investors, buyers, or shareholders review the company's history.
- If your business is dealing with directors resolutions and wants help with board approvals, shareholder agreements, share issues, or major commercial contracts, you can reach us on 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.








