Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
If you employ staff in New Zealand (or you’re about to hire your first team member), the Employment Relations Act 2000 is one of the key laws you’ll be dealing with.
It can feel like “employment law” is a maze of processes, paperwork and risk. But once you understand what the Employment Relations Act is trying to achieve (and what it expects from you as an employer), it becomes much easier to build good habits, avoid disputes, and manage your team with confidence.
This practical guide breaks down the Employment Relations Act 2000 from a small business perspective: what it is, what it covers, and what you should put in place from day one.
What Is The Employment Relations Act (And Why Does It Matter)?
The Employment Relations Act 2000 (often shortened to the “ER Act”) is a central part of New Zealand employment law. In simple terms, it sets the rules for:
- how employment relationships are formed and maintained
- the “good faith” behaviour expected from both employers and employees
- how employment agreements should be negotiated
- how issues and disputes should be raised and resolved
- the role of unions and collective bargaining
- the powers of the Employment Relations Authority (ERA)
For small businesses, the ER Act matters because it’s not just about what you can do as an employer - it’s also about how you do it. Even when you have a good reason for a decision (like performance concerns, restructuring, or changing hours), you still need a fair process that aligns with the law.
Getting this right early protects your business and also helps you build a workplace that people actually want to be part of.
Good Faith: The Core Idea Behind The Employment Relations Act 2000
If there’s one concept that comes up again and again under the Employment Relations Act 2000, it’s good faith.
Good faith is more than just being polite or “reasonable”. It’s a legal obligation that shapes how you communicate, consult, and respond to your team. In practice, good faith generally means you should:
- be honest and communicative (especially about important decisions that affect the employee)
- not mislead or deceive, or remain silent when you should clarify something
- respond in a timely way
- provide relevant information where required (for example, during consultation)
- give genuine consideration to feedback (not just “go through the motions”)
Where Employers Commonly Get Caught Out
In day-to-day business, good faith issues often arise when an employer:
- makes a decision first, then “consults” after the fact
- doesn’t provide enough information for the employee to respond meaningfully
- announces a restructure without a fair proposal and consultation period
- doesn’t follow their own policies or process
A practical way to stay on track is to make sure you have clear documentation and a consistent framework, such as a properly drafted Employment Contract and a Staff Handbook that matches how you actually run your business.
Employment Agreements: What The Act Expects You To Do Before Someone Starts
A common misconception is that “the employment agreement is just paperwork.” Under the Employment Relations Act 2000 in NZ, employment agreements (and the steps around entering into them) are a big deal.
While employment agreements can be individual or collective, the practical reality for most small businesses is that you’ll be issuing individual employment agreements to each employee.
Your Core Obligations When Hiring
When you offer someone a job, you generally need to ensure:
- the employee receives the proposed agreement (in writing)
- the employee is advised they can seek independent advice, and is given a reasonable opportunity to do so
- you don’t pressure them to sign immediately
- the employee signs the agreement before they start work (or as early as possible if timing is genuinely tight)
- the final signed agreement accurately reflects the role (hours, pay, duties, location, etc.)
From a risk perspective, a vague or outdated agreement is one of the fastest ways to end up in a dispute later - particularly if the working arrangement evolves over time (new duties, new reporting lines, changed hours, remote work, and so on).
What Should Be In A Practical Employment Agreement?
Every business is different, but a well-drafted agreement commonly covers:
- job title and duties (and flexibility where appropriate)
- place of work (including travel and remote work expectations)
- hours of work, overtime expectations, and rostering
- pay, pay review processes, and any incentives/commission
- leave and holidays (aligned with the Holidays Act)
- confidentiality and intellectual property expectations
- discipline and performance management process
- termination notice and process
It also helps to align your agreement with your internal expectations through a Workplace Policy suite, so your team knows what “good” looks like in practice (and you can apply rules consistently).
Managing Issues Fairly: Performance, Misconduct, And Termination
Most employment disputes don’t start because an employer wanted to do the wrong thing. They start because the business moved too quickly, skipped steps, or didn’t document the process.
The Employment Relations Act places a lot of weight on procedure and fairness. That means if you’re dealing with performance issues or misconduct, you should be thinking about two things at the same time:
- substance: do you have a genuine, evidence-based reason for concern?
- process: are you handling it in a fair and reasonable way?
Performance Management (The Practical Approach)
If an employee isn’t meeting expectations, you’ll usually want to take a structured approach, such as:
- clearly explaining the concern (with examples)
- giving the employee a real chance to respond
- setting expectations and a timeframe for improvement
- providing reasonable support/training where relevant
- documenting meetings and outcomes
- warning the employee of possible consequences if there’s no improvement
This isn’t about creating paperwork for the sake of it. It’s about being able to show that you acted fairly, communicated clearly, and gave the employee an opportunity to improve.
Misconduct And Investigations
If you’re dealing with misconduct (for example, breach of policies, inappropriate behaviour, dishonesty, or serious safety issues), it’s still important to slow down and run a proper process.
Depending on the situation, this can include:
- an investigation phase (including gathering evidence)
- putting allegations to the employee clearly
- allowing a support person/representative
- considering the employee’s response before deciding outcomes
If you have roles where conflicts can arise (for example, staff dealing with family members, side businesses, supplier relationships, or competitors), having a clear Conflict Of Interest Policy can prevent issues before they escalate.
Termination: A Lawful Outcome Still Needs A Lawful Process
Even where termination may be justified, you generally need to ensure you’ve:
- followed a fair process
- considered alternatives (where appropriate)
- given proper notice (or followed contractual notice arrangements)
- paid all final entitlements correctly
Because termination is a high-risk area, it’s usually worth getting specific advice before you move forward - particularly if the employee is raising grievances, has been with you a long time, or the situation is sensitive.
Restructures, Redundancy, And Business Changes Under The Employment Relations Act
Small businesses change quickly. You might need to restructure because:
- work has slowed down
- you’ve lost a key client
- you’re changing your service model
- you’re introducing new technology
- you’re selling the business or buying another business
Even when a restructure makes complete commercial sense, the Employment Relations Act 2000 expects you to follow a genuine, good-faith process - especially where roles may be disestablished or materially changed.
What A Fair Restructure Process Often Involves
While the right process depends on your situation, a fair approach typically includes:
- preparing a proposal that explains what is changing and why
- sharing relevant information with impacted employees
- giving employees time to review and provide feedback
- considering feedback with an open mind
- then making a final decision and communicating it clearly
Redundancy and restructure processes are a common source of disputes simply because employers are busy and want to “just get it done.” If you’re planning changes, getting advice early can save a lot of time and cost later - and that’s where Redundancy Advice can be particularly helpful.
Disputes, Personal Grievances, And The Employment Relations Authority (ERA)
No matter how careful you are, disputes can still happen. The Employment Relations Act provides pathways for resolving issues, including:
- raising issues internally (often the best place to start)
- mediation (often facilitated through MBIE)
- formal action through the Employment Relations Authority (ERA)
What Is A Personal Grievance?
A personal grievance is a formal type of complaint an employee can raise in certain circumstances. One of the most common is an unjustified dismissal, but grievances can also relate to disadvantage, discrimination, harassment, or other serious issues.
In many cases, an employee must raise a personal grievance with their employer within 90 days of the action happening (or coming to their notice), although there are limited exceptions.
The practical takeaway for employers is this: if a situation has a reasonable chance of escalating, your documentation, process and communication will matter.
How The ERA Looks At Employer Conduct
The ERA generally focuses on what was fair and reasonable in the circumstances (rather than expecting perfection). That said, employers often run into trouble when they:
- can’t prove what happened (no notes, no written warnings, no clear expectations)
- haven’t followed their contract or policies
- haven’t genuinely consulted (in restructure scenarios)
- have treated different employees inconsistently
If you’re ever unsure how to approach a tricky situation, speaking with an Employment Lawyer early is usually far cheaper than trying to fix a messy process after the fact.
Key Takeaways
- The Employment Relations Act 2000 is a core NZ employment law that shapes how you hire, manage, and end employment relationships - not just what outcomes you can reach.
- Good faith is central under the Employment Relations Act 2000, and it affects communication, consultation, and how you make decisions that impact employees.
- A clear, tailored employment agreement (and consistent workplace policies) helps prevent misunderstandings and gives you a framework to manage issues fairly.
- Performance management, misconduct processes, and termination all need both a valid reason and a fair process - documentation and consistency matter.
- Business changes like restructures and redundancy need genuine consultation and the right steps, even when the commercial decision feels straightforward.
- When disputes escalate, the Employment Relations Authority (ERA) will closely examine whether you acted fairly and reasonably in the circumstances.
If you’d like help putting the right employment documents in place, managing a performance or termination process, or navigating a restructure, you can reach us at 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.
This article is general information only and does not constitute legal advice. For advice tailored to your business and circumstances, speak with a qualified lawyer.


