Selected cases

Employment Court of New Zealand · [2023] NZEmpC 158

Turner v Te Whatu Ora

The posts were seen by colleagues and raised concerns about workplace influence and reputation.

Employment Court of New Zealand21 Sept 2023

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Employers can justify dismissal for serious misconduct arising from social media posts if those posts damage the organisation’s reputation or breach codes of conduct.
  • Turner v Te Whatu Ora is a New Zealand Employment Court case where a nurse was dismissed for serious misconduct after posting anti-vaccine and offensive comments on...

Use this to check

  • Employers can discipline staff for social media conduct if it impacts the workplace or breaches codes.
  • Dismissal must be justified by serious misconduct and follow fair process.
  • Clear policies and codes of conduct are essential for managing online behaviour risks.

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Amanda Turner was employed as a registered palliative care nurse by the Wairarapa District Health Board (DHB) from May 2015 until her summary dismissal in April 2021.
    • The DHB became aware of Ms Turner’s Facebook posts, which included anti-vaccine content and offensive comments about Muslims.
    • These posts were shared among her Facebook friends and came to the attention of other staff at an aged care facility, leading to concerns about vaccine hesitancy among staff.
    • The DHB investigated the posts, obtained screenshots from a concerned nurse, and met with Ms Turner to discuss the issue.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The legal issue was whether the DHB’s summary dismissal of Ms Turner for her Facebook posts was justified, and whether the DHB followed a fair process.
    • The Court also considered whether Ms Turner’s rights to privacy and freedom of expression were breached, and if the DHB acted in a discriminatory manner.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Employment Court found that Ms Turner’s Facebook posts constituted serious misconduct, breaching both the DHB’s Code of Conduct and the Nursing Council’s standards.
    • The DHB’s investigation and dismissal process was fair, and Ms Turner’s lack of remorse or understanding of the seriousness of her actions justified summary dismissal.
    • The Court rejected claims of discrimination and breach of privacy or freedom of expression, confirming that employment codes and reputation protection can override personal expression in certain contexts.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Employers can justify dismissal for serious misconduct arising from social media posts if those posts damage the organisation’s reputation or breach codes of conduct.
  • The Employment Court found that the DHB’s process was fair and that the posts were sufficiently serious to warrant summary dismissal.
  • Employers should ensure their policies are up-to-date, communicate expectations clearly, and follow a fair process when investigating and disciplining staff for online conduct.

Useful next steps

  • Employers can discipline staff for social media conduct if it impacts the workplace or breaches codes.
  • Dismissal must be justified by serious misconduct and follow fair process.
  • Clear policies and codes of conduct are essential for managing online behaviour risks.
  • Freedom of expression is limited by employment obligations and workplace standards.
  • Investigate and document all steps before making disciplinary decisions.

The story

Amanda Turner worked as a community palliative care nurse for the Wairarapa District Health Board. In early 2021, the DHB learned that Ms Turner had posted anti-vaccine and offensive comments about Muslims on Facebook. These posts were seen by other staff and caused concern at an aged care facility, particularly as Ms Turner was a respected nurse whose views could influence others.

The DHB investigated the matter, obtained screenshots of the posts, and met with Ms Turner to discuss her conduct. Ms Turner argued that her posts were private and that the DHB’s actions were unfair and discriminatory. The DHB concluded that the posts breached its Code of Conduct and the Nursing Council’s standards, and dismissed Ms Turner for serious misconduct.

Key takeaways

  • Employers can discipline staff for social media conduct if it impacts the workplace or breaches codes.
  • Dismissal must be justified by serious misconduct and follow fair process.
  • Clear policies and codes of conduct are essential for managing online behaviour risks.
  • Freedom of expression is limited by employment obligations and workplace standards.
  • Investigate and document all steps before making disciplinary decisions.

What the Court decided

The Employment Court found that Ms Turner’s Facebook posts were not balanced discussions but included memes and strongly worded statements against individuals and groups. The posts were considered offensive and contrary to the DHB’s interests, especially given the focus on promoting COVID-19 vaccination among Māori and vulnerable communities.

The Court held that the DHB’s investigation and dismissal process was fair. Ms Turner showed no remorse or understanding of the seriousness of her actions, and the DHB was justified in dismissing her for serious misconduct. The Court rejected Ms Turner’s claims of discrimination and breach of privacy or freedom of expression, confirming that employment codes and reputation protection can override personal expression in certain contexts.

How to read this for your business

This case shows that employers can act on employee social media conduct if it affects the workplace or breaches organisational standards. The posts do not need to be made during work hours or on work devices; what matters is their impact on the business and its reputation.

Employers should ensure their codes of conduct and social media policies are clear, regularly updated, and communicated to staff. When investigating potential misconduct, employers must follow fair procedures, including gathering evidence, meeting with the employee, and considering their response before making decisions.

Practical checks for employers

Employers should take practical steps to manage risks from staff social media activity. Start by reviewing your policies and ensuring they cover online conduct, including what is considered serious misconduct. Provide training to staff about appropriate online behaviour and the potential consequences of breaching workplace standards.

If an issue arises, investigate promptly and fairly. Gather evidence, meet with the employee, and keep records of all actions. Consider the impact of the conduct on the workplace and whether dismissal is proportionate. Seek advice if unsure about the process or legal risks.

Common questions

Can employers discipline staff for social media posts made outside work?

Yes, if the posts impact the workplace, breach codes of conduct, or damage the organisation’s reputation, employers may take disciplinary action.

What should employers do before dismissing an employee for social media conduct?

Employers should investigate thoroughly, give the employee a chance to respond, and follow fair procedures as outlined in employment law and workplace policies.

Does freedom of expression protect employees from dismissal for offensive posts?

Freedom of expression is not absolute in employment. If posts breach workplace codes or harm the employer’s reputation, dismissal may be justified.

How can businesses reduce risks from staff social media activity?

Businesses should have clear social media and conduct policies, communicate expectations, and provide training on appropriate online behaviour.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help