Selected cases

Employment Court of New Zealand · [2025] NZEmpC 2

Young v Port of Tauranga Ltd

Young v Port of Tauranga Ltd is a key Employment Court case about dismissal under government-mandated COVID-19 vaccination orders.

Employment Court of New Zealand17 Jan 2024

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Employers must comply with government vaccination orders and apply them fairly to affected roles.
  • Young v Port of Tauranga Ltd is a key Employment Court case about dismissal under government-mandated COVID-19 vaccination orders.

Use this to check

  • Employers must comply with government vaccination orders for affected roles.
  • Exemptions must follow the official process and be approved by the Director-General of Health.
  • Employers are not required to seek exemptions or conduct extra risk assessments unless required by law.

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Stuart Young was employed as a tug engineer by Port of Tauranga Ltd.
    • His role involved hands-on engineering work on tugs.
    • In 2021, the government issued the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order, requiring certain border workers to be vaccinated.
    • The Port of Tauranga was classified as an affected port, and Mr Young’s role fell under the order’s definition of an affected person.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The central legal issue was whether Mr Young’s dismissal was justified under the Employment Relations Act, given the requirements of the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order.
    • The Court had to decide if Mr Young’s role was covered by the order, whether he held a valid exemption, and whether the employer’s process met the standard of a fair and reasonable employer in all the circumstances.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Employment Court found that Mr Young’s role was covered by the vaccination order and that his claimed exemption was not valid under the updated rules.
    • The Port of Tauranga followed a fair and reasonable process, including considering redeployment.
    • The dismissal was justified, as the employer complied with the government order and acted fairly.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Employers must comply with government vaccination orders and apply them fairly to affected roles.
  • If an employee claims an exemption, the employer should check its validity under current rules.
  • Employers are not required to seek exemptions on behalf of employees or conduct additional risk assessments unless specifically required by law.
  • Redeployment options should be considered only if feasible and permitted by the employer’s policies and operational needs.

Useful next steps

  • Employers must comply with government vaccination orders for affected roles.
  • Exemptions must follow the official process and be approved by the Director-General of Health.
  • Employers are not required to seek exemptions or conduct extra risk assessments unless required by law.
  • Redeployment should be considered if feasible, but is not mandatory.
  • Fair process and clear documentation are key to justifying dismissal under vaccination orders.

The story

Stuart Young worked as a tug engineer at Port of Tauranga Ltd, a major New Zealand port. His job involved maintaining tugs and working closely with other crew members. In 2021, the government introduced COVID-19 vaccination orders for border workers, including those at affected ports like Tauranga.

Mr Young was unvaccinated and presented a certificate from his doctor claiming exemption. However, the exemption process changed, requiring approval from the Director-General of Health. The Port decided all employees must be vaccinated from January 2022. Mr Young was dismissed and challenged the decision, arguing it was unfair.

Key takeaways

  • Employers must comply with government vaccination orders for affected roles.
  • Exemptions must follow the official process and be approved by the Director-General of Health.
  • Employers are not required to seek exemptions or conduct extra risk assessments unless required by law.
  • Redeployment should be considered if feasible, but is not mandatory.
  • Fair process and clear documentation are key to justifying dismissal under vaccination orders.

What the court decided

The Employment Court examined whether Mr Young’s dismissal was justified under the Employment Relations Act and the COVID-19 vaccination order. The Court focused on three issues: whether Mr Young’s role was covered by the order, whether he had a valid exemption, and whether the Port’s process was fair and reasonable.

The Court found that Mr Young was an affected person under the order, his exemption was not valid under the updated rules, and the Port followed a fair process. The dismissal was justified because the Port complied with the government order and considered redeployment options.

How to read this for your business

If your business is subject to a government vaccination order, you must apply it to affected roles. Check whether employees claiming exemptions meet the official requirements. You are not required to seek exemptions or conduct risk assessments beyond what the order requires.

Consider redeployment if possible, but you do not have to redeploy if it is not feasible or permitted by your policies. Document your process and decisions to show you acted fairly and reasonably.

Practical checks for employers

Employers should regularly review government orders and update workplace policies accordingly. When an employee claims an exemption, verify its validity and ensure it follows the official process. If redeployment is considered, assess operational needs and document any alternatives offered.

Keep clear records of communications, decisions, and the reasoning behind actions taken. This helps demonstrate compliance and fairness if a dispute arises.

Common questions

Do employers have to seek medical exemptions for employees under vaccination orders?

No. Employers are not required to seek exemptions on behalf of employees unless the law specifically requires it.

What should employers do if an employee claims a vaccination exemption?

Employers should check if the exemption is valid under the current rules and whether it has been approved by the Director-General of Health.

Are employers required to redeploy unvaccinated employees?

Employers should consider redeployment options if feasible, but are not required to redeploy if operational needs or policies do not allow it.

Can an employee be dismissed for refusing vaccination if a government order applies?

Yes, if the role is covered by a government order and the employee cannot meet the requirement or obtain a valid exemption, dismissal may be justified if the process is fair.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help