Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- What Is Misrepresentation In A Job Offer (And Why It Matters In New Zealand)?
- Where Employers Get Caught Out: Verbal Promises, Emails And “Casual” Conversations
How To Reduce Legal Risk When Making Job Offers (A Practical Checklist)
- 1. Be Clear About What You Know Versus What You’re Hoping For
- 2. Put Key Terms In Writing Early (But Keep Them Accurate)
- 3. Avoid “Handshake Benefits” That Aren’t Documented
- 4. Make Sure The Contract Allows For Reasonable Change (Without Overreaching)
- 5. Keep Recruitment Records (So You Can Prove What Was Actually Said)
- What Happens If There’s A Misrepresentation Claim?
- Key Takeaways
Hiring is one of the biggest growth steps you’ll take as a small business owner. When you finally find the right person, it’s tempting to move fast - a few enthusiastic conversations, a quick email confirming salary and start date, and you’re off.
But this is exactly where risk can sneak in. If something you say (or write) during recruitment turns out to be inaccurate - even unintentionally - you can end up dealing with claims of misrepresentation, costly disputes, and a damaged employment relationship before it even starts.
This article breaks down how misrepresentation can arise in job offers in New Zealand, what it looks like in practice, and the simple steps you can build into your hiring process to protect your business from day one.
What Is Misrepresentation In A Job Offer (And Why It Matters In New Zealand)?
In plain terms, misrepresentation is when one party makes a statement that is false or misleading, and the other party relies on it when deciding whether to enter into an agreement.
In a hiring context, misrepresentation can happen when:
- you make a statement (verbally, in writing, or even by omission),
- the candidate relies on that statement when accepting the role, and
- the statement turns out to be wrong or misleading in a way that matters.
Even if you didn’t intend to mislead anyone, the issue is often whether the candidate relied on what you said when making a big life decision - like resigning from their job, relocating, or turning down other offers.
In New Zealand, employers should keep in mind a few key legal “pressure points”:
- Contract law principles (misleading statements made before a contract is signed can still have consequences).
- The Employment Relations Act 2000 and the duty of good faith (which can apply in the bargaining and negotiation stage too).
- The Fair Trading Act 1986 (generally focused on business-to-consumer conduct, but it can sometimes be raised in an employment context depending on the facts - so it’s worth being careful about statements made during recruitment).
If you’re thinking “we’re a small business, not a big corporate employer” - that’s exactly why it’s worth getting this right. Small teams have less room to absorb the cost and disruption of a dispute.
Common Examples Of Misrepresentation In Job Offers
Misrepresentation in job offers often doesn’t look like an obvious lie. It usually comes from optimistic assumptions, informal conversations, or “selling” the role a bit too hard.
Here are some common examples we see (or that can easily happen in real life):
Salary, Commission And Bonus Promises That Aren’t Clear
It’s common to talk about “OTE” (on-target earnings), bonuses, or commission structures in early-stage discussions. The risk is when the candidate reasonably thinks they’re guaranteed a certain amount, but your business sees it as conditional or aspirational.
To reduce risk, make sure any variable pay is:
- clearly defined (how it’s calculated, when it’s paid, and what conditions apply),
- consistent across what you said verbally and what’s in writing, and
- captured properly in the Employment Contract (or in a written commission schedule attached to it).
Job Title And Duties That Change After They Start
You might hire someone as an “Operations Manager” because that’s the role you hope to build - but once they start, you actually need them doing admin, reception, and customer service.
If the role is materially different to what was represented, you risk disputes about:
- whether the employment agreement was entered into based on misleading information, and
- whether changes to duties amount to an unjustified disadvantage or breach of good faith.
Hours Of Work And Flexibility Assurances
Statements like “we’re flexible” or “it’s basically 9–5” can become problematic if the job actually requires regular weekend work, split shifts, or overtime.
If flexibility is subject to business needs, say that clearly, and reflect it in the contract (including any overtime expectations or TOIL arrangements where relevant).
Work Location And Remote Work Commitments
If you tell a candidate they can work from home two days per week, and then after they start you “change your mind”, that can quickly turn into a relationship breakdown - and in some cases, legal risk.
If remote work is still being trialled or depends on performance, it’s better to document it as a conditional arrangement with a review point, rather than a permanent promise.
Business Stability And “Growth” Statements
Sometimes misrepresentation claims come from statements like:
- “We’ve got plenty of work lined up for the next year,”
- “This role will definitely become full-time in three months,” or
- “We’re not planning any restructure.”
If your business is in a volatile period (funding uncertainty, a major customer at risk, seasonal demand), you don’t necessarily need to share every internal detail - but you do need to be careful not to paint a picture that isn’t accurate.
Overconfident promises can backfire later, especially if you need to reduce staff hours or restructure soon after hiring.
Where Employers Get Caught Out: Verbal Promises, Emails And “Casual” Conversations
A lot of employment disputes don’t start with the signed contract. They start with what was said in the lead-up.
In recruitment, it’s very normal to communicate through:
- informal phone calls,
- texts and LinkedIn messages,
- “quick” offer emails, and
- in-person chats where everyone’s excited to get started.
The problem is that candidates often treat these statements as reliable commitments - especially if they’re specific (salary, hours, start date, benefits, training, future progression).
To keep things tight, your goal is consistency across:
- the job advertisement,
- the interview discussion,
- any written offer communications, and
- the final employment agreement.
If you’re still negotiating or unsure, it’s okay to say that - but be explicit. For example, “We’re considering a bonus structure, but it’s not final yet,” is much safer than “You’ll get a bonus on top.”
It also helps to make sure your team is aligned. If a manager is “selling” the role in interviews, but the business owner intends to run the role differently, that mismatch is where misrepresentation risk grows.
How To Reduce Legal Risk When Making Job Offers (A Practical Checklist)
When it comes to avoiding misrepresentation claims in New Zealand job offers, the best protection is a clear process. You don’t need to make hiring slow or overly formal - you just need to build a few safeguards into the way you communicate.
1. Be Clear About What You Know Versus What You’re Hoping For
There’s a difference between:
- a current fact (e.g. “your base salary will be $X”), and
- a future possibility (e.g. “we may expand the team later this year”).
Where you’re talking about “future state” matters (promotions, pay rises, full-time conversion, new locations), keep it framed as conditional unless you’re genuinely committing to it.
2. Put Key Terms In Writing Early (But Keep Them Accurate)
Small businesses often make offers quickly by email. That’s fine - as long as the email doesn’t accidentally overpromise.
A good approach is to send a short written summary that matches the draft agreement, such as:
- role title and reporting line,
- base salary or hourly rate,
- hours/days of work,
- work location, and
- any conditions (references, eligibility for a trial period where applicable, etc.).
Then, make sure the employment agreement reflects the same terms. If you need help tailoring it to your business (rather than using generic templates), having the right Employment Contract in place is a practical starting point.
3. Avoid “Handshake Benefits” That Aren’t Documented
Perks are great, but they’re also a common misrepresentation trap.
Examples include:
- extra paid leave “whenever you need it”,
- personal use of a work vehicle,
- guaranteed training or professional development budgets,
- work-from-home arrangements, or
- shares or profit share discussions.
If you’re offering any of these, document the detail (including limits and review rights). If you’re not ready to commit, keep it out of the offer communications until it’s finalised.
4. Make Sure The Contract Allows For Reasonable Change (Without Overreaching)
Even with the best planning, your business may need to adjust duties, reporting lines, or locations as you grow.
Your employment agreement should be drafted so it’s clear what the role includes, and how changes will be handled - including consultation where required. This won’t automatically let you change fundamental terms unilaterally, but it can reduce misunderstandings and help you show you acted reasonably.
5. Keep Recruitment Records (So You Can Prove What Was Actually Said)
If a dispute comes up later, it’s helpful to have a clear record of what the offer was based on.
Practical steps include:
- keeping copies of job ads,
- saving key emails and written offer details,
- keeping interview notes (even brief ones), and
- confirming any changes to the offer in writing.
This isn’t about “lawyering up” your hiring. It’s about reducing ambiguity - because ambiguity is where disputes thrive.
What Happens If There’s A Misrepresentation Claim?
If a new hire alleges they accepted the job based on misleading information, the outcome depends on the facts - including what was said, whether it was reasonable to rely on it, and what loss or disadvantage they experienced.
In practice, misrepresentation issues can lead to:
- early employment disputes (including a personal grievance process),
- pressure to renegotiate pay, duties, location, or working arrangements,
- costs and time dealing with mediation or legal advice, and
- reputational damage (especially in tight-knit industries or small towns).
Misrepresentation risk also overlaps with other employer obligations. For example, if your offer communications are unclear and you later terminate the employee early due to “not being a fit”, you still need to ensure you have followed a fair and lawful process. Having the right employment documentation and process support upfront can reduce the chance that a shaky start turns into a bigger issue later.
If the issue is linked to changing business conditions (like reduced revenue), you may need to consider options such as adjusting hours or restructuring - but those steps come with their own obligations and should be handled carefully.
And if you’re collecting candidate information during recruitment (CVs, reference checks, background checks), make sure you’re handling it properly under privacy rules, including having a fit-for-purpose Privacy Policy if your recruitment process runs through your website.
How To Build Misrepresentation Protection Into Your Hiring Process
A strong hiring process isn’t just an HR “nice to have” - it’s part of your legal foundations as an employer.
Here’s a simple, scalable way to reduce the risk of misrepresentation (without turning recruitment into a headache):
Use A Consistent Offer Pack
Many small businesses benefit from using the same core set of documents each time they hire. Your offer pack might include:
- a standard offer email template with carefully drafted wording,
- an employment agreement tailored to your business,
- a position description that matches the real role, and
- key workplace policies (conduct, leave approval, IT use, privacy, etc.).
If you’re building out your policies, a comprehensive Staff Handbook can help you keep expectations consistent across the team (and reduce reliance on informal promises).
Train Anyone Who Interviews Candidates
If multiple people in your business speak to candidates - co-founders, managers, team leads - align them on what can and can’t be promised.
It’s worth giving interviewers a simple script guide such as:
- what the salary package is (and what’s still under discussion),
- what flexibility is available (and what depends on business needs), and
- what the next 3–6 months realistically looks like for the business.
This doesn’t need to be formal training. Even a 20-minute internal briefing can prevent weeks of stress later.
Be Careful With “Company Growth” Representations
If you’re in a startup phase, it’s natural to talk about exciting plans. Just make sure your statements are grounded.
Instead of “We’re definitely raising funding next quarter,” you might say, “We’re actively working on fundraising, but timelines can shift - your role and base pay won’t depend on fundraising outcomes.”
This helps you recruit confidently while staying accurate.
Make Sure Your Business Structure And Decision-Making Are Clear
Sometimes offer disputes arise because different owners give different messages - especially if the business is run by multiple founders.
If you’re operating with multiple decision-makers, getting your governance and roles clear (and documented) can prevent mixed signals. Depending on your structure, that might include having a Company Constitution in place, or setting out expectations between owners through a Shareholders Agreement.
That way, the person negotiating with candidates actually has clarity on what the business can commit to.
Key Takeaways
- Misrepresentation in job offers in New Zealand can arise when a candidate relies on inaccurate or misleading statements made during recruitment, even if you didn’t intend to mislead them.
- Common risk areas include salary/commission, role duties, hours, flexibility, remote work arrangements, and optimistic statements about business growth or job security.
- Verbal promises, informal emails, and casual messages can create real expectations - so keep offer communications consistent with the final contract.
- A clear, tailored Employment Contract and supporting policies (like a Staff Handbook) can help you set expectations properly from day one.
- Keep recruitment records and confirm key terms in writing to reduce ambiguity and protect your business if issues arise later.
- If your recruitment process collects personal information, make sure you handle it appropriately and consider whether you need a fit-for-purpose Privacy Policy.
Note: This article is general information only and doesn’t take into account your specific circumstances. If you need advice on a particular job offer or dispute, it’s best to get legal advice.
If you’d like help tightening up your job offer process, preparing an employment contract, or reviewing the wording you use during recruitment, reach us at 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.


