Selected cases

Employment Court of New Zealand · [2023] NZEmpC 74

Nelmac Ltd v Reunited Employees Assoc Inc

The Authority fixed the terms of the collective agreement and found REA breached good faith.

Employment Court of New Zealand16 May 2023

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • The Employment Court confirmed that both employers and unions must uphold the duty of good faith during collective bargaining.
  • Nelmac Ltd v Reunited Employees Association Inc [2023] NZEmpC 74 is a significant Employment Court case about collective bargaining and the duty of good faith.

Use this to check

  • Employers and unions must bargain in good faith during collective agreement negotiations.
  • Antagonistic or unproductive conduct can lead to legal intervention and financial penalties.
  • Facilitation may be sought if bargaining becomes protracted and unproductive.

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Reunited Employees Association Inc (REA) and Nelmac Ltd had a longstanding relationship governed by collective agreements.
    • In 2017, their negotiations became contentious, leading to protracted bargaining for a new agreement starting in July 2020.
    • The Employment Relations Authority (ERA) intervened, first accepting a reference for facilitation under s 50C(1) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 due to the prolonged and unproductive talks.
    • The ERA then fixed the terms of the collective agreement and found that REA had breached the duty of good faith.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The central legal issue was whether the Reunited Employees Association Inc breached the duty of good faith during collective bargaining with Nelmac Ltd, and whether Nelmac was entitled to costs arising from the Employment Relations Authority’s investigation meetings.
    • The Court also considered whether Nelmac breached its contractual obligations and whether penalties should be imposed for alleged breaches.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Employment Court dismissed REA’s challenge, confirming the Authority’s finding that REA breached the duty of good faith.
    • Nelmac’s challenge to the costs determination was successful, and the Court awarded Nelmac $15,000 for costs related to the Authority’s investigation meetings.
    • No additional disbursements were awarded.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • The Employment Court confirmed that both employers and unions must uphold the duty of good faith during collective bargaining.
  • If negotiations become antagonistic or unproductive, either party may face legal scrutiny and financial penalties.
  • Employers should document their bargaining efforts, seek facilitation if talks stall, and be prepared to challenge or defend conduct before the Authority or Court.
  • Clear communication and a willingness to compromise are essential to avoid costly disputes.

Useful next steps

  • Employers and unions must bargain in good faith during collective agreement negotiations.
  • Antagonistic or unproductive conduct can lead to legal intervention and financial penalties.
  • Facilitation may be sought if bargaining becomes protracted and unproductive.
  • The Authority can fix the terms of a collective agreement if facilitation fails.
  • Costs may be awarded based on the parties’ conduct during bargaining and proceedings.

The story

Nelmac Ltd and the Reunited Employees Association Inc (REA) had a history of collective agreements. In 2017, their relationship soured, leading to difficult negotiations for a new agreement from July 2020. Both sides adopted antagonistic approaches, resulting in stalled talks and extensive efforts to resolve differences.

The Employment Relations Authority intervened, first accepting a reference for facilitation due to the protracted bargaining. When facilitation failed, the Authority fixed the terms of the collective agreement and found REA had breached the duty of good faith. Costs were reserved, and Nelmac sought reimbursement. Both parties challenged the Authority’s decisions, leading to a hearing in the Employment Court.

Key takeaways

  • Employers and unions must bargain in good faith during collective agreement negotiations.
  • Antagonistic or unproductive conduct can lead to legal intervention and financial penalties.
  • Facilitation may be sought if bargaining becomes protracted and unproductive.
  • The Authority can fix the terms of a collective agreement if facilitation fails.
  • Costs may be awarded based on the parties’ conduct during bargaining and proceedings.

What the Court decided

The Employment Court reviewed both challenges: REA’s dispute over the finding that it breached good faith and Nelmac’s challenge to the costs determination. The Court found that REA’s conduct during bargaining was problematic and unproductive, confirming the Authority’s finding that REA breached the duty of good faith.

Nelmac’s challenge to the costs determination was successful. The Court awarded Nelmac $15,000 for costs arising from the Authority’s investigation meetings, based on the daily tariff for four hearing days. The Court did not award additional disbursements claimed by Nelmac, finding those costs were part of the bargaining process and not wasted expense.

How to read this for your business

If your business is involved in collective bargaining, this case shows the risks of adopting antagonistic or unproductive negotiation tactics. Both employers and unions must act in good faith, which means being honest, sharing relevant information, and seeking compromise.

Document your bargaining efforts and communications. If negotiations stall, consider seeking facilitation through the Employment Relations Authority. If disputes escalate, be prepared for the Authority or Court to review your conduct and potentially fix the terms of the agreement or award costs.

Operating checklist

To avoid disputes and financial penalties during collective bargaining, follow these practical steps:

Common questions

What is the duty of good faith in collective bargaining?

The duty of good faith requires both employers and unions to engage in honest, constructive negotiations, share relevant information, and avoid misleading or obstructive conduct during collective bargaining.

Can an employer challenge a union’s conduct during bargaining?

Yes. If an employer believes a union has breached the duty of good faith, it can seek intervention from the Employment Relations Authority or Court, as Nelmac Ltd did in this case.

What happens if bargaining becomes protracted and unproductive?

The Employment Relations Authority may accept a reference for facilitation to help resolve the dispute. If facilitation fails, the Authority can fix the terms of the collective agreement.

Are costs always awarded in employment disputes?

No. Costs are discretionary and depend on the conduct of the parties and the circumstances. In this case, costs were awarded to Nelmac Ltd due to the nature of the dispute and the Authority’s investigation meetings.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help