Selected cases

Employment Court of New Zealand · [2024] NZEmpC 28

Keighran v Kensington Tavern Ltd

Mr Keighran, a restaurant manager, was involved in a workplace dispute following a criminal allegation.

Employment Court of New Zealand23 Feb 2024

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Employers must consult with staff before making significant changes to their roles or hours, especially when those changes are prompted by workplace disputes or external...
  • Keighran v Kensington Tavern Ltd [2024] NZEmpC 28 is a significant Employment Court decision clarifying employer duties when changing an employee’s role, handling...

Use this to check

  • Employers must consult before changing an employee’s role or duties.
  • Written employment agreements are legally required for all staff.
  • Failure to follow fair process can result in compensation and penalties.

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Mr Keighran worked at Kensington Tavern from November 2018 and was promoted to restaurant manager in March 2019.
    • In July 2020, he requested a pay rise, which was declined.
    • Shortly after, an incident involving a teenage co-worker led to police involvement and Mr Keighran was charged with indecent assault (conviction occurred after his employment ended).
    • The complainant’s family, some of whom worked at the Tavern, raised concerns with management.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The legal issue was whether Kensington Tavern’s actions in changing Mr Keighran’s role and failing to provide a written employment agreement amounted to unjustified disadvantage and constructive dismissal.
    • The Court examined whether the employer had consulted adequately, acted in good faith, and followed legal requirements for employment agreements.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Employment Court set aside the Authority’s determination and found in favour of Mr Keighran.
    • The Court ordered Kensington Tavern to pay three months’ lost wages, increased compensation for emotional harm, and a penalty for failing to provide a written employment agreement.
    • The Court emphasised the importance of consultation, fair process, and compliance with employment law.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Employers must consult with staff before making significant changes to their roles or hours, especially when those changes are prompted by workplace disputes or external incidents.
  • Failing to provide a written employment agreement can result in penalties.
  • The Court expects employers to act in good faith, communicate clearly, and consider the impact of their decisions on all parties.
  • If an employee feels forced to resign due to the employer’s actions, they may have grounds for a constructive dismissal claim.

Useful next steps

  • Employers must consult before changing an employee’s role or duties.
  • Written employment agreements are legally required for all staff.
  • Failure to follow fair process can result in compensation and penalties.
  • Sensitive workplace incidents require careful management and clear communication.
  • Compensation for lost wages and emotional harm can be substantial if breaches are found.

The story

Mr Keighran was a valued employee at Kensington Tavern, promoted to restaurant manager after demonstrating commitment and skill. In July 2020, he requested a pay rise, which was declined. Shortly after, an incident outside the workplace involving a teenage co-worker led to police involvement and heightened tensions among staff and their families.

Management responded by asking Mr Keighran to stay home temporarily, aiming to protect all parties and maintain workplace harmony. After further discussions, his role was changed from restaurant manager to bar manager. Feeling sidelined and unsupported, Mr Keighran left and did not return, later bringing claims against the Tavern for constructive dismissal and related breaches.

Key takeaways

  • Employers must consult before changing an employee’s role or duties.
  • Written employment agreements are legally required for all staff.
  • Failure to follow fair process can result in compensation and penalties.
  • Sensitive workplace incidents require careful management and clear communication.
  • Compensation for lost wages and emotional harm can be substantial if breaches are found.

What the Court decided

The Employment Court found that Kensington Tavern failed to follow fair process when changing Mr Keighran’s role and did not adequately consult him. The Court also noted the absence of a written employment agreement, which is a legal requirement. The Court determined that Mr Keighran had been unjustifiably disadvantaged and that the employer’s actions contributed to his resignation.

The Authority’s earlier compensation award was increased, and the employer was ordered to pay additional compensation for lost wages and emotional harm. A penalty was also imposed for failing to provide a written employment agreement.

Consultation and good faith in role changes

Employers must consult with employees before making significant changes to their roles, hours, or duties. This includes discussing the reasons for change, considering the employee’s views, and documenting the process. Acting in good faith means being open, honest, and respectful in all communications.

Failure to consult can lead to claims for unjustified disadvantage or constructive dismissal. The Court expects employers to demonstrate that they considered the employee’s interests and provided opportunities for input.

Handling sensitive workplace incidents

When a workplace incident involves criminal allegations or heightened tensions, employers must balance safety, fairness, and business needs. Consulting external advisers (such as industry associations) can help ensure decisions are appropriate and lawful.

Temporary measures, such as asking an employee to stay home, should be clearly communicated and reviewed regularly. Any permanent changes to roles or duties must be discussed with the employee and justified by business needs.

Written employment agreements: legal requirements

New Zealand law requires employers to provide written employment agreements to all employees. These agreements set out terms, conditions, and expectations. Failure to provide a written agreement can result in penalties, as seen in this case.

Employers should ensure all staff have signed agreements before starting work and keep copies on file. Regularly review agreements to ensure compliance with current law and business needs.

Compensation and penalties for breaches

Employees who suffer unjustified disadvantage or constructive dismissal may be awarded compensation for lost wages and emotional harm. The Court considers the impact on the employee and the employer’s conduct.

Penalties can also be imposed for breaches such as failing to provide a written employment agreement. Employers should be aware that compensation and penalties can add up quickly, especially if multiple breaches are found.

Common questions

What is constructive dismissal?

Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee feels forced to resign because their employer’s actions make continued employment untenable. It can arise from significant changes to role, hours, or workplace conditions without proper consultation.

Do employers have to provide written employment agreements?

Yes. Under New Zealand law, employers must provide written employment agreements to all employees. Failure to do so can result in penalties, as seen in this case.

How should employers handle workplace disputes involving criminal allegations?

Employers should consult with all affected parties, seek external advice if needed, and act in good faith. Safety and fairness must be balanced, and any changes to roles or duties should be discussed with the employee.

What compensation can employees claim for unjustified disadvantage?

Employees may be awarded compensation for lost wages and emotional harm. The amount depends on the circumstances and the impact on the employee, as determined by the Court.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help