Selected cases

Employment Court of New Zealand · [2025] NZEmpC 136

Tighe-Umbers v Jetconnect Limited

Captain Tighe-Umbers, a pilot, was dismissed for failing to comply with the COVID-19 vaccination order.

Employment Court of New Zealand4 July 2025

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Employers must not rush to dismiss staff who cannot comply with health orders.
  • Tighe-Umbers v Jetconnect Limited is a significant Employment Court case clarifying employer obligations when dismissing staff for incapacity due to public health orders.

Use this to check

  • Employers must consider reasonable alternatives to dismissal, such as leave without pay, before terminating employment for incapacity.
  • Failure to exhaust alternatives can result in a finding of unjustified dismissal.
  • Consultation and clear documentation are essential when managing staff affected by public health orders.

Decision snapshot

  1. What happened

    • Captain Phillip Tighe-Umbers was employed as a pilot by Jetconnect Limited, which supplies crew for Qantas Airways’ trans-Tasman flights.
    • His employment was governed by a collective agreement with the New Zealand Airline Pilots Association.
    • During the COVID-19 pandemic, border closures and travel restrictions led to extended periods of leave without pay for pilots.
    • In 2021, the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Vaccinations) Order was amended to require aircrew members to be vaccinated.
  2. What the court had to decide

    • The legal issue was whether Jetconnect Limited unjustifiably dismissed Captain Tighe-Umbers by failing to consider reasonable alternatives, specifically leave without pay, before terminating his employment for non-compliance with the COVID-19 vaccination order.
    • The Court examined whether Jetconnect breached the notice period provision in the employment agreement and Schedule 3A clause 3(4) of the Employment Relations Act 2000, which requires employers to consider alternatives to dismissal for incapacity.
  3. What the court decided

    • The Employment Court found Jetconnect’s dismissal of Captain Tighe-Umbers was unjustified.
    • Jetconnect failed to ensure all reasonable alternatives to termination were exhausted, particularly by not granting leave without pay.
    • The Court held that no fair and reasonable employer could have refused leave without pay in these circumstances.

Practical impact

Practical read

  • Employers must not rush to dismiss staff who cannot comply with health orders.
  • Instead, they should carefully consider all reasonable alternatives, including leave without pay, and document their decision-making process.
  • Failure to do so can result in a finding of unjustified dismissal, even when the employee cannot perform their role due to legal restrictions.
  • This case demonstrates the need for clear communication, consultation, and adherence to both employment agreements and legislative obligations.

Useful next steps

  • Employers must consider reasonable alternatives to dismissal, such as leave without pay, before terminating employment for incapacity.
  • Failure to exhaust alternatives can result in a finding of unjustified dismissal.
  • Consultation and clear documentation are essential when managing staff affected by public health orders.
  • Legislative requirements, such as Schedule 3A of the Employment Relations Act, override employer discretion.
  • Collective agreements and employment contracts must be followed alongside legislative obligations.

The story

Captain Phillip Tighe-Umbers worked as a pilot for Jetconnect Limited, operating Qantas flights from Auckland. His employment was governed by a collective agreement with the New Zealand Airline Pilots Association. The COVID-19 pandemic led to extended leave without pay for pilots, and later, the government introduced a vaccination order requiring aircrew to be vaccinated.

Captain Tighe-Umbers provided a medical certificate citing adverse reactions to vaccinations and explored the possibility of a medical exemption, which was not pursued. Jetconnect recalled him to duty, requiring vaccination. After ongoing consultation, Jetconnect terminated his employment for non-compliance with the vaccination order. Captain Tighe-Umbers challenged the dismissal, arguing Jetconnect failed to consider alternatives like leave without pay.

Key takeaways

  • Employers must consider reasonable alternatives to dismissal, such as leave without pay, before terminating employment for incapacity.
  • Failure to exhaust alternatives can result in a finding of unjustified dismissal.
  • Consultation and clear documentation are essential when managing staff affected by public health orders.
  • Legislative requirements, such as Schedule 3A of the Employment Relations Act, override employer discretion.
  • Collective agreements and employment contracts must be followed alongside legislative obligations.

What the Court decided

The Employment Court found that Jetconnect unjustifiably dismissed Captain Tighe-Umbers. The Court held that Jetconnect failed to ensure all reasonable alternatives to termination were exhausted, specifically by not granting leave without pay as an option. Schedule 3A clause 3(4) of the Employment Relations Act 2000 requires employers to consider alternatives before dismissing an employee for incapacity.

The Court did not make a finding on whether Schedule 3A was an implied term of the employment agreement, but emphasised the legislative obligation to consider alternatives. Remedies and costs were reserved for later determination.

How to read this for your business

If your business employs staff who are subject to public health orders, you must follow a fair and reasonable process before considering dismissal. This includes consulting with the employee, reviewing medical evidence, and considering alternatives such as leave without pay.

Document your decision-making process and ensure you comply with both your employment agreements and relevant legislation. Rushing to dismiss without exploring alternatives can expose your business to legal claims and reputational risk.

Practical checks for employers

Employers should establish a clear process when dealing with employees unable to comply with health orders. Start by consulting with the employee and seeking medical evidence. Explore all reasonable alternatives, including leave without pay, redeployment, or flexible arrangements.

Keep detailed records of all communications and decisions. If dismissal is considered, ensure it is a last resort and that all alternatives have been exhausted. Seek advice if unsure about legislative requirements or collective agreement terms.

Operating checklist for compliance

Use this checklist to ensure your business follows fair process when considering dismissal for incapacity or non-compliance with health orders.

Common questions

What was the main issue in Tighe-Umbers v Jetconnect Limited?

The main issue was whether Jetconnect unjustifiably dismissed Captain Tighe-Umbers by failing to consider reasonable alternatives, such as leave without pay, before terminating his employment for non-compliance with the COVID-19 vaccination order.

Does an employer have to offer leave without pay before dismissing an employee for incapacity?

Yes, the Employment Court found that employers must consider reasonable alternatives, including leave without pay, before deciding to dismiss an employee who cannot perform their role due to legal restrictions.

How does this case affect businesses with staff under public health orders?

Businesses must ensure they follow fair process and actively consider alternatives to dismissal when staff are affected by public health orders, documenting their decision-making and consulting with employees.

What should employers do if an employee cannot comply with a health order?

Employers should consult with the employee, consider reasonable alternatives like leave without pay, and document their process before making any decision about dismissal.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help