Main laws

New Zealand Act

Climate Change Response Act 2002

The Climate Change Response Act 2002 contains New Zealand's national climate framework and the legal machinery for the Emissions Trading Scheme.

In forceNew ZealandPlain-English guide12 practical checks

Plain-English explainers, not legal advice. Use the linked official source for section-level detail, and get advice for your situation.

Get legal help

Start here

Quick read

  • Part 8 is a significant litigation change.
  • It bars tort liability where an activity causes or contributes to greenhouse-gas emissions and those emissions cause or contribute to the defined climate effects.

Likely relevant if

  • Businesses and public entities whose activities cause or contribute to greenhouse-gas emissions and could otherwise face a tort claim for emissions-related climate effects
  • Businesses involved in existing emissions-related tort proceedings that were not finally determined on 25 August 2026
  • Owners, registered forestry right holders, leaseholders and some Crown conservation contract parties for post-1989 forest land who choose standard forestry or permanent forestry activities under Schedule 4

Check first

  • Separate the new tort bar from continuing obligations under the Emissions Trading Scheme and other legislation.
  • If an emissions-related claim or threatened claim exists, check the exact scope and transitional application of Part 8 before changing litigation strategy.
  • Check whether your business is or may be a participant for an activity listed in Schedule 3 or an applicant participant for an activity listed in Schedule 4.

Part 8 changes climate-related tort claims, not every obligation

Part 8 came into force on 25 August 2026. It applies where a person's activity causes or contributes to greenhouse-gas emissions and those emissions cause or contribute to emissions-related climate change effects. In that situation, the person has no tort liability for those effects.

The definition is broad. It covers climate change itself and resulting damage, harm, interference, loss or other wrongs, including effects on health, property, public rights and the use or enjoyment of property. It can apply where activities or effects occur inside or outside New Zealand, directly or indirectly, and before or after commencement.

QuestionPosition under Part 8
Who can rely on it?A person, including companies, unincorporated bodies, overseas persons and public entities.
Which liability is covered?Direct or vicarious liability in tort for emissions-related climate change effects.
Which remedies are covered?Interim and final tort remedies, including declarations, injunctions and monetary relief.
Does it reach older conduct?Yes. Transitional rules cover activities, emissions and effects before, at or after commencement.
Does it cancel other laws?No. Other legislation continues to operate separately.

The change reaches pending proceedings

The transitional provisions make Part 8 relevant immediately. It applies to Smith v Fonterra Co-operative Group Ltd, to other proceedings started but not finally determined before commencement, and to proceedings begun from commencement onwards.

The Act also states that no compensation is payable because of the amendment's operation. Businesses involved in a climate-related tort claim should review pleadings and strategy against the enacted provisions rather than assuming an older filing date preserves the former position.

What this Act does

The Climate Change Response Act 2002 is a broad framework law, but it is also a practical compliance law. At the national level, it covers the 2050 target, emissions budgets, emissions reduction planning, the Climate Change Commission, climate risk assessment and adaptation planning.

For many businesses, the more immediate part is the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. The Act sets up the registry system, participant rules, monitoring and return obligations, allocation rules, EPA powers, review and appeal rights, and offences and penalties.

That means a business should not treat this Act as policy-only. If your operations fall within the ETS parts, the Act can create direct filing, record-keeping, account, unit and governance obligations.

Key points

  • Read the Act in two layers - national climate framework and ETS compliance system
  • Check whether your business is directly in scope under Schedule 3 or Schedule 4 activities
  • Check whether you buy fuel, coal or natural gas in a threshold-based way covered by Schedule 4
  • If you are in forestry or industrial allocation, review the specific ETS rules before acting

Who is in scope and who is usually out

The businesses most likely to be directly affected are those carrying out activities that make them ETS participants, applicant participants, or allocation claimants. The Act expressly deals with participants for activities listed in Schedule 3 and applicants to be registered for activities listed in Schedule 4.

Schedule 4 clearly includes standard forestry and permanent forestry removal activities for post-1989 forest land. It also includes some other removal activities, some hydrofluorocarbon and perfluorocarbon activities, and some threshold-based fuel and stationary energy activities.

Many ordinary service businesses will not be direct ETS participants. But they can still be affected if they contract with participants, buy inputs whose price reflects ETS costs, or handle regulated gases in ways that create separate compliance risk under the Act.

Key points

  • Post-1989 forest land owners who choose the relevant Schedule 4 forestry part
  • Registered forestry right holders and leaseholders for qualifying post-1989 forest land
  • Parties to a Crown conservation contract for qualifying post-1989 forest land
  • Businesses carrying out eligible industrial activities that may receive allocation
  • Businesses exporting hydrofluorocarbons or perfluorocarbons, including when contained in goods, where any prescribed threshold is met
  • Businesses destroying hydrofluorocarbons or perfluorocarbons where any prescribed threshold is met
  • Businesses purchasing obligation fuel from one or more Schedule 3 participants where any prescribed threshold is met
  • Businesses purchasing coal above the annual threshold stated in Schedule 4
  • Businesses purchasing natural gas above the annual threshold stated in Schedule 4

If your business does not carry out one of those activities, you may still need to check contracts, pricing and operational procedures. But your risk is more likely to be indirect than direct ETS participant liability.

Trigger points businesses should watch

Businesses often discover this Act matters when a transaction, operational change or EPA notice arrives. The practical trigger points are usually not abstract climate policy events. They are business events that change whether you are a participant, what you must report, or whether units must be surrendered or repaid.

Forestry is a common example. A change in ownership, a registered forestry right, a lease structure, or a choice between standard forestry and permanent forestry treatment can change who needs to act under the Act.

Industrial and energy businesses should also watch threshold-based activities, allocation applications, and any change that affects emissions calculations or return accuracy.

In practice

  • Buying, selling or restructuring interests in post-1989 forest land
  • Choosing standard forestry or permanent forestry treatment for qualifying land
  • Starting or stopping an activity listed in Schedule 3 or Schedule 4
  • Purchasing obligation fuel in a way that may meet a prescribed threshold
  • Purchasing coal above 250,000 tonnes per year
  • Purchasing natural gas above 2 petajoules per year
  • Applying for industrial allocation or making an allocation adjustment
  • Exporting or destroying hydrofluorocarbons or perfluorocarbons
  • Receiving an EPA information request, ruling, amendment, assessment or decision

Core ETS obligations in practice

If your business is directly inside the ETS parts of the Act, the compliance cycle is structured and ongoing. The Act covers registration as a participant, the requirement to have a holding account, monitoring of emissions and removals, liability to surrender units to cover emissions, and entitlement to receive New Zealand units for some removal activities.

The Act also requires annual emissions returns and, for some removal activities, quarterly returns. It requires retention of emissions records. For industrial allocation, it also deals with applications, decisions, annual allocation adjustments, closing allocation adjustments, reconsideration and retention of records and materials.

In practice, this means your legal position depends heavily on systems. You need clear responsibility for data collection, calculation methods, filing, account management and document retention.

Records, documents and internal controls

This Act is document-heavy. The EPA can prescribe forms, require information, conduct inquiries, amend emissions returns, and assess defaults where returns are not submitted. The Act also says amendments and assessments are presumed correct unless proved otherwise.

That makes record quality a legal issue, not just an admin issue. If your calculations, assumptions or source data are weak, it becomes harder to challenge an amendment, assessment or penalty later.

Businesses should also pay attention to emissions rulings. The Act allows applications for emissions rulings, sets out when the EPA may decline to make them, and requires notice of changes relevant to or failures to comply with those rulings.

Key points

  • Participant registration records
  • Holding account details and transaction records
  • Monitoring data for emissions and removals
  • Annual emissions returns and any quarterly returns
  • Allocation applications, projected data and adjustment records
  • Documents supporting thresholds, classifications and activity status
  • EPA notices, rulings, amendments, assessments and responses
  • Internal approvals showing who checked and signed off key filings

EPA powers, reviews and appeals

The EPA has broad administrative and enforcement powers under the ETS parts of the Act. These include powers to require information, inquire into matters, issue and correct emissions rulings, amend emissions returns, assess defaults, and require repayment of units in cases of error.

If you are affected by an EPA decision under the ETS participant provisions, you may request the EPA to review the decision. The Act states that the request must generally be made within 20 working days after receiving notice of the decision. For certain forestry classification decisions, the 20 working day period runs from publication.

The Act also provides a right of appeal to the District Court and appeals to the High Court on questions of law only.

Key points

  • Record the date you received the EPA decision
  • Check whether the 20 working day review period applies
  • Gather the records and calculations supporting your position
  • Keep managing current compliance obligations while the challenge proceeds
  • Escalate any amendment, assessment or repayment issue quickly

A key point for business is that a challenge does not automatically stop the compliance clock. The Act says the obligation to surrender or repay units is not suspended by review or appeal. It also says the obligation to pay a penalty is not suspended by appeal.

So if you dispute an EPA decision, you need a dual-track plan. Preserve your review or appeal rights, but also manage immediate unit and cash-flow exposure.

Offences, penalties and personal exposure

The Act contains a substantial enforcement framework. Under Part 4, it includes offences for failure to comply with various provisions, breach of confidentiality, failure to provide information or documents, other specified offences, and evasion or similar offences.

It also creates civil-style financial consequences for ETS non-compliance, including penalties for failing to surrender or repay units by the due date, failing to submit emissions returns by the due date, failing to submit allocation adjustments by the due date, and submitting incorrect information in returns or allocation material. Penalties are debts due to the Crown, and interest can apply for late payment.

These are not just company-level risks. The Act also deals with liability of body corporates, liability of directors and managers, and liability for acts or omissions of directors, agents and employees.

Key points

  • Failure to comply with ETS participant provisions can trigger offences or penalties
  • Failure to provide information or documents can be an offence
  • Incorrect emissions returns can trigger penalties
  • Incorrect information in allocation applications or adjustments can trigger penalties
  • Late surrender or repayment of units can trigger penalties
  • Late payment can attract interest
  • Company conduct can be attributed through directors, employees and agents

If a body corporate is convicted of an offence under Part 4, directors and managers can also be guilty if the offence occurred with their authority, permission or consent, or if they knew it was to be or was being committed and failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent or stop it.

That makes governance important. Directors should make sure ETS responsibilities are allocated clearly, staff are trained, and issues are escalated early.

Synthetic greenhouse gases and operational handling risk

The Act also matters for some businesses dealing with synthetic greenhouse gases. Schedule 4 includes specified export and destruction activities involving hydrofluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons where prescribed thresholds are met.

The Act also includes importer record and information offences and unlawful release offences in this area. Businesses importing, exporting, destroying or handling relevant gases should connect operational procedures with accurate regulator-facing records.

Risk points

  • Identify whether your business imports, exports or destroys relevant gases
  • Check whether any prescribed threshold applies to your activity
  • Keep accurate records and information for regulator-facing obligations
  • Train staff on handling procedures where gas release risk exists
  • Investigate and document any incident that could affect compliance

Contracts and transaction checks

Even where the Act does not make you a direct participant, it can still affect commercial documents. The clearest examples are forestry and supply arrangements. Forestry transactions may need clear drafting on who holds ETS rights, who carries surrender or repayment risk, who keeps records, and who must notify the EPA.

Supply arrangements can also be affected where a counterparty's ETS costs flow into pricing. The Act itself does not prescribe your contract wording, but it creates the legal setting that makes these clauses commercially important.

For a time-poor business owner, the practical question is simple: where could this Act change who pays, who reports, or who carries the risk if the regulator asks questions later?

Key points

  • Check forestry sale and purchase documents for ETS responsibility clauses
  • Check leases and forestry rights for who controls registration, returns and units
  • Check supply contracts for pricing mechanisms linked to ETS costs
  • Check indemnities where one party relies on the other's emissions data or filings
  • Check internal delegations for who can respond to EPA notices or approve returns

Dates and current status

The Climate Change Response Act 2002 is in force and has been amended many times. The Climate Change Response (Tort Liability) Amendment Act 2026 received Royal assent on 24 August 2026 and commenced the following day.

The principal Act page was still labelled as consolidated at 1 January 2026 when this guide was checked. Read it together with the 2026 amendment Act for the new Part 8 rules. The regulations, notices and sector rules applying to the activity also remain relevant.

Key points

  • Use the current consolidation of the principal Act
  • Check the regulations and notices governing the specific ETS activity
  • Keep the new tort bar separate from the Act's ETS rules and other legislation
  • Review any pending emissions-related tort proceeding against the transitional provisions

Common questions

Does Part 8 remove all legal risk connected with emissions?

No. It bars tort liability for the emissions-related climate change effects defined in the Act. Section 274 says the bar applies regardless of whether other legislation applied or could have applied, whether it was complied with, or whether enforcement action was taken under it. The Act's ETS rules continue to operate separately.

Does the tort bar apply only to future emissions?

No. The transitional provisions extend it to activities, emissions and effects occurring before, at or after commencement. It also applies to proceedings begun before commencement that were not finally determined, including Smith v Fonterra, and to proceedings begun later.

Does this Act apply to every New Zealand business directly?

No. Many businesses are affected only indirectly. The strongest direct obligations sit in the ETS parts of the Act and apply to participants, applicants, allocation claimants, some forestry parties, and some businesses dealing with specified gases or threshold-based activities.

What is the first thing a business should check?

Check whether you carry out an activity listed in Schedule 3 or Schedule 4, whether you buy fuel, coal or natural gas in a way that meets a threshold in Schedule 4, or whether you may apply for industrial allocation. If yes, you may need to register, hold an account, file returns, keep records, and surrender or repay units.

If I challenge an EPA decision, do my ETS obligations pause?

Usually not. The Act states that obligations to surrender or repay units are not suspended by review or appeal. It also states that obligations to pay penalties are not suspended by appeal.

Does the Act cover forestry businesses?

Yes. The Act includes participant registration and removal activity rules for post-1989 forest land under Schedule 4, including standard forestry and permanent forestry choices. It also contains provisions dealing with pre-1990 forest land allocation in other parts.

Can directors be personally exposed if the company breaches the Act?

Yes, in some cases. If a body corporate is convicted of an offence under Part 4, directors and people concerned in management can also be guilty if the offence happened with their authority, permission or consent, or if they knew it was to be or was being committed and failed to take all reasonable steps to prevent or stop it.

What records matter most under this Act?

For ETS participants and allocation claimants, records supporting emissions and removals monitoring, emissions returns, allocation applications and adjustments, and responses to EPA information requests are critical. The Act specifically requires retention of emissions records and retention of records and materials for allocation.

Related topics

How Sprintlaw can help

Update history

Amendment25 Aug 2026

Climate-related tort liability bar comes into force

The Climate Change Response (Tort Liability) Amendment Act 2026 inserted Part 8 into the Climate Change Response Act. From 25 August 2026, Part 8 bars tort liability for emissions-related climate change effects in the circumstances set out in section 271. It also applies to Smith v Fonterra and other proceedings that were not finally determined when the change commenced.