Alex is a co-founder of Sprintlaw. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
Mia runs an online leadership training business in Wellington. A large community organisation asks to use her slide decks, videos and facilitator notes across 10 regional offices. It's a great opportunity - but Mia feels uneasy about handing over the materials she's spent years building.
That's a very normal concern. When you license course content, you're not usually selling your IP. You're giving someone permission to use it in a controlled way, for a specific purpose, on specific terms.
The agreement matters because small wording choices can make a big difference. Can the other organisation edit your workbook? Train its own facilitators? Put its logo on your videos? Keep using old versions after the contract ends? These are the questions worth settling before the content leaves your hands.
What Is A Course Content Licensing Agreement?
A course content licensing agreement is a contract that lets another organisation use your training materials without taking ownership of them.
For online educators, this usually covers materials like:
- video lessons, webinars and recordings
- slides, workbooks, templates and quizzes
- facilitator guides and trainer notes
- assessments, certificates and completion badges
- learning platform content, scripts and downloadable resources
- your course name, logos, trade marks and branding assets
In New Zealand, your course materials will often be protected by copyright under the Copyright Act 1994. Copyright can protect things like written content, graphics, videos, sound recordings and software code, as long as the material meets the legal requirements for protection.
A copyright licence doesn't usually transfer copyright ownership. Instead, it gives the licensee a permission slip. The agreement should explain exactly what they can do with your materials and what they can't do.
This is where a course content licence agreement can do a lot of heavy lifting. A good agreement doesn't just say, "you can use the course". It spells out the commercial deal, the IP controls, the delivery rules and what happens if the relationship ends.
If your course is built around a distinctive name or brand, you may also want to think about trade mark protection through IPONZ. A registered trade mark can make it easier to control how others use your course name or logo, especially if you're planning to license it more widely.
Can I License Training Materials Without Losing IP Control?
Yes, you can license training materials without losing IP control, but your agreement needs to be clear that ownership stays with you.
The most important distinction is between ownership and permission to use. Your agreement should say that you keep all intellectual property rights in the course content, except for the limited rights you expressly grant to the licensee.
It should also deal with any new materials created during the relationship. This is often where things get messy.
For example, the licensee might create:
- custom slides for its staff
- translated versions of your worksheets
- industry-specific examples based on your framework
- recordings of live sessions delivered using your materials
- data reports based on learner results
You don't want to discover later that the licensee believes it owns a modified version of your core course and can keep using it after the licence ends.
A practical approach is to divide IP into categories:
- Your existing IP: the course, materials, methods, branding and know-how you bring into the deal.
- The licensee's existing IP: their internal documents, branding, policies and business information.
- New content or improvements: anything created during the licence, including adaptations, translations or updated modules.
Your agreement should say who owns each category and who can use it after the contract ends.
If you're licensing education content in New Zealand and your course includes third-party materials, check your own rights too. You may need permission to sublicense stock images, music, articles, case studies, software, AI-generated outputs or guest presenter content. If your upstream permission is narrow, you can't safely give the licensee broader rights than you have.
What Licence Scope Should I Give The Other Organisation?
It depends on the deal, but the safest licence scope is usually specific, limited and tied to the way the course will actually be delivered.
Licence scope answers one big question: what exactly are you allowing the other organisation to do?
For an online course licence agreement in New Zealand, think about limiting the licence by:
- Purpose: for internal staff training, customer education, franchisee onboarding or paid public courses.
- Users: named staff, a fixed number of learners, members of one organisation, or approved clients.
- Territory: New Zealand only, Australia and New Zealand, or global access.
- Time: a 12-month licence, a pilot period, or a rolling annual arrangement.
- Platform: your learning platform, the licensee's LMS, a private intranet or live workshops only.
- Format: online, in person, blended learning, recorded sessions or downloadable materials.
The broader the licence, the more control you give up. That doesn't mean broad licences are wrong. It just means the price, reporting, quality controls and termination rights should match the commercial risk.
Worked Example
Say Mia licenses her leadership course to a national not-for-profit for 12 months. The agreement allows the organisation to enrol up to 200 staff on its internal LMS, using Mia's videos, slides and workbook. It doesn't allow use for paid public workshops or training external clients.
Mia charges a $6,000 licence fee plus $90 per learner above the first 200 users. If 260 staff enrol, the extra fee is 60 x $90, which is $5,400. Total licence revenue is $11,400, plus GST if applicable.
Because the scope is clear, Mia can price the deal properly and the organisation knows exactly what it's getting.
How Do I Control Copying, Editing And Facilitator Use?
You control copying, editing and facilitator use by setting practical rules in the agreement, not just relying on broad copyright wording.
Most course content risks come from everyday behaviour. Someone downloads a workbook and emails it around. A facilitator removes your copyright notice. A manager records a live session and reuses it for another team next year.
Your agreement should say what copying is allowed. For example, you might allow the licensee to:
- make one digital copy for upload to an approved LMS
- print one workbook per enrolled learner
- store materials securely for the licence period
- make backup copies for technical reasons only
It should also say what isn't allowed, such as:
- sharing materials with people outside the approved audience
- selling or sublicensing your materials to another organisation
- removing copyright notices, watermarks or branding
- uploading materials to public websites or shared drives
- training AI tools on your course content without permission
Facilitator Rules
If the other organisation will use its own trainers, be very clear in the training agreement about who can facilitate the course and what training they need first.
You might require facilitators to:
- be approved by you in writing
- complete your train-the-trainer session
- follow your facilitator guide and learning outcomes
- avoid making legal, financial, medical or other professional claims outside the course scope
- keep participant information confidential
If you're engaging contractors to deliver training for your own business, employment status can also matter. The Employment Relations Act 2000 and the 2026 contractor gateway test changes may affect how contractor arrangements are assessed. If your facilitators work like employees in practice, a contractor label may not be enough. Get tailored advice on that side of the model if you're scaling delivery through facilitators.
Can The Licensee Use My Branding And Make Changes?
Yes, the licensee can use your branding or make changes if you allow it, but you should set approval rights and quality controls before anything goes live.
Branding is often one of the most valuable parts of a course. If a partner runs a poor-quality session under your course name, it can affect your reputation even if you didn't deliver it yourself.
Your agreement should cover:
- whether the licensee can use your course name, business name, logo or badges
- whether they must say the course is "licensed from" or "powered by" your business
- whether they can co-brand materials with their own logo
- where branding must appear on slides, certificates and learner resources
- what brand guidelines they must follow
- when they need your written approval before publishing or presenting materials
If your trade marks are registered with IPONZ, the licence should describe how the licensee can use those marks. If they're not registered, you can still control branding by contract, but registration may give you extra protection.
Changes to course content deserve separate treatment. Small administrative changes, like inserting dates or contact details, are usually low risk. Substantive changes, like rewriting your learning outcomes or adding new claims, are much more sensitive.
A simple approval structure can help:
- Permitted changes: formatting, dates, participant names and approved co-branding.
- Approval required: wording changes, new examples, translations, edited videos and adapted assessments.
- Not allowed: removing your attribution, changing legal or compliance content without approval, or presenting modified materials as your original course.
If the course makes marketing claims, keep the Fair Trading Act 1986 in mind. Claims about outcomes, qualifications, employment benefits or revenue potential need to be accurate and not misleading. Don't let a licensee add claims to your content that you wouldn't be comfortable making yourself.
How Should Updates, Fees And Revenue Share Work?
Updates, fees and revenue share should be tied to clear milestones, reporting obligations and payment rules so both sides know how the money works.
Course content changes over time. You may refresh videos, update references, add modules or remove outdated material. Your agreement should say whether the licensee gets updates automatically, only during the licence term, or only if they pay an update fee.
For compliance-heavy courses, updates are especially important. If your materials refer to laws, safety rules, privacy practices or industry standards, old versions can create confusion. You might require the licensee to stop using outdated versions within a set period after you provide an update.
Common Fee Models
There are several ways to structure payment:
- Fixed licence fee: a set fee for a defined period and scope.
- Per learner fee: a fee for each enrolled user or completed learner.
- Revenue share: a percentage of course revenue paid to you.
- Hybrid model: a base licence fee plus per learner fees or revenue share.
- Minimum guarantee: the licensee pays a minimum amount even if enrolments are lower than expected.
Revenue share can be attractive, but it needs careful drafting. Define what counts as revenue and what can be deducted. Otherwise, you may end up debating discounts, refunds, platform fees, GST, bundle pricing and marketing costs.
For example, if the licensee sells your course for $300 per learner and you receive 25% of net course fees excluding GST and refunds, 80 paid learners would generate $24,000 in course fees. Your share would be $6,000, assuming no agreed deductions other than GST and refunds.
Ask for regular reporting. Monthly or quarterly reports might include enrolments, completions, revenue received, refunds, active facilitators and where the course was delivered.
If learner data is shared between you and the licensee, the Privacy Act 2020 may apply. Your agreement should cover what personal information is collected, who can use it, security standards, breach notification processes and whether each party's privacy policy needs updating.
What Happens When The Licence Ends?
When the licence ends, the licensee should stop using your course content and return, delete or archive materials as the agreement requires.
Termination is where your IP control is tested. If your agreement is vague, the licensee may assume it can keep using downloaded materials, old recordings or adapted versions.
Your termination clause should cover:
- when either side can end the agreement for convenience
- when you can terminate immediately, such as serious IP misuse or non-payment
- notice periods, such as 30 days for ordinary termination if that suits the deal
- what happens to learners already enrolled when the licence ends
- whether the licensee can finish courses already underway
- when materials must be deleted, returned or taken offline
- whether the licensee must certify deletion
- which clauses survive, such as confidentiality, IP ownership, payment and audit rights
Think carefully about transition rights. If 50 learners are halfway through a programme, you may want to let them finish within 30 or 60 days, while blocking new enrolments. That can protect your relationship without leaving the licence open-ended.
You may also want audit rights. This lets you check whether the licensee has complied with user limits, revenue share reporting and deletion obligations. Keep audit wording practical and reasonable so it doesn't feel like a trap. For example, you might require reasonable notice, business hours access and confidentiality around the licensee's records.
If something goes wrong, start by collecting records: the signed agreement, invoices, LMS reports, screenshots, emails, usage data and copies of any modified materials. Then review the contract process before sending anything formal. Disputes can escalate quickly, so it's worth getting help early if your IP is still being used after termination.
Course Content Licensing Agreement Template: What Should It Include?
A useful content licence agreement template can help you plan the deal, but it shouldn't be treated as a finished document. A lawyer should tailor it before you use it, especially if the licence is high value, involves your brand or includes revenue share.
This is different from your online course terms and conditions. Here is a practical fill-in outline for your agreement:
- Parties: write the legal names, NZBNs if available, addresses and contact people for each business.
- Background: briefly describe your course, the licensee's intended use and the commercial purpose.
- Definitions: define course materials, approved users, facilitators, platform, territory, revenue and confidential information.
- Licence Grant: state exactly what rights you grant, including purpose, duration, territory, format and audience.
- Restrictions: list what the licensee can't do, including copying, sublicensing, public sharing, AI training and removing notices.
- Facilitator Use: set approval, training, delivery standards and record-keeping requirements for trainers.
- Branding And Attribution: explain logo use, co-branding, trade mark rules and approval rights.
- Changes And Updates: cover permitted edits, approval processes, new versions and use of outdated materials.
- Fees And Reporting: set licence fees, per learner fees, revenue share, GST treatment, invoice timing and reports.
- Privacy And Data: deal with learner information, security, access, breach processes and permitted data uses.
- Confidentiality: protect non-public materials, pricing, facilitator notes, business information and platform access details.
- Warranties And Compliance: cover authority to enter the deal, third-party rights, Fair Trading Act compliance and course claims.
- Term And Termination: state the start date, end date, renewal process, termination rights and post-termination obligations.
- Records And Audit: set what records the licensee must keep and when you can check them.
- Liability: allocate risk for misuse, unauthorised changes, learner claims, platform issues and third-party content.
- General Terms: include notices, assignment, subcontracting, governing law, variation and signing rules.
Templates often miss the business-specific parts, especially scope, revenue share and facilitator control. Those are the clauses that usually matter most when the relationship grows.
Key Takeaways
- A course content licence lets another organisation use your materials without taking ownership of your IP.
- Your agreement should define the licence scope clearly, including users, platform, territory, time period and delivery format.
- Copying limits, facilitator rules, branding controls and approval rights help protect the quality and value of your course.
- Revenue share needs careful wording around GST, refunds, discounts, reporting and deductions.
- Termination clauses should explain what happens to learners, materials, old versions, recordings and adapted content.
- Privacy, Fair Trading Act compliance, copyright and trade mark issues can all matter when your course is delivered by someone else.
If you'd like help with your course content licence, facilitator rules, IP ownership clauses or revenue share terms, you can reach us at 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.
Drafted by Taylor, Sprintlaw's AI, and overseen by Alex Solo. How we write
Protect your brand
What intellectual property should you protect?
If a name, logo, design or other creative work matters to the business, check who owns it, what permissions you need and whether clearance or registration is appropriate.








