Alex is Sprintlaw’s co-founder and principal lawyer. Alex previously worked at a top-tier firm as a lawyer specialising in technology and media contracts, and founded a digital agency which he sold in 2015.
- What Is Employee Suspension (And Why Is It A Legal Minefield)?
How Do You Suspend An Employee? A Best Practice Process For Small Businesses
- Step 1: Check Your Employment Agreement And Policies
- Step 2: Identify The Reason Suspension Is Necessary (Not Just Helpful)
- Step 3: Consider Alternatives To Suspension
- Step 4: Meet With The Employee And Consult (Where Reasonably Possible)
- Step 5: Confirm The Suspension In Writing
- Step 6: Run A Prompt, Fair Investigation
- Step 7: Review The Suspension As Things Change
- Key Takeaways
Finding yourself in a situation where you’re considering suspending an employee is never fun.
For most small businesses, it happens rarely (if ever) - and when it does, it’s usually urgent, stressful, and wrapped up with bigger issues like misconduct allegations, safety concerns, or serious breakdowns in trust.
The tricky part is that suspension isn’t “just” sending someone home. In New Zealand, it can create real legal risk if it isn’t handled carefully, fairly, and in line with your employment agreement and your obligations under employment law.
Below, we’ll break down how suspension works in NZ, when it may be appropriate, what you should pay, and a best practice process to follow so you can protect your business (and handle the situation properly from day one).
This article is general information only and isn’t legal advice. Because suspension decisions are very fact-specific, it’s worth getting tailored advice before taking action.
What Is Employee Suspension (And Why Is It A Legal Minefield)?
Employee suspension usually means you direct an employee not to attend work (or not to perform some or all of their duties) while you look into an issue - often during an investigation or disciplinary process.
In practice, suspension can look like:
- Suspension on full pay while you investigate serious misconduct allegations
- Suspension with conditions (e.g. they can work from home but can’t contact certain clients or staff)
- Being removed from the workplace due to health and safety risks or risk of interference with evidence
Suspension is sensitive because it can feel like a punishment - even when you intend it as a temporary, neutral step. If you suspend someone without good reason, without consultation (where reasonably possible), or without following a fair process, it can become the foundation for a personal grievance claim (for unjustified disadvantage or, in some cases, unjustified dismissal).
In NZ, you’ll usually need to think about:
- The Employment Relations Act 2000 (including the duty of good faith and fair process)
- The employment agreement (does it allow suspension and on what terms?)
- Health and safety duties under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015
- Privacy issues under the Privacy Act 2020 (especially during investigations)
If your Employment Contract is silent on suspension, that doesn’t automatically mean you can’t ever suspend - but it does mean you need to be extra careful about your justification, consultation, and the fairness of the process you follow.
When Can You Suspend An Employee In New Zealand?
There’s no single “one size fits all” rule in NZ that says exactly when you can suspend. Instead, the key idea is: suspension should only be used when it’s reasonably necessary, and you should be able to explain why it’s necessary (not just convenient).
Common scenarios where suspension may be appropriate include:
1) Serious Misconduct Allegations
If there’s an allegation of theft, fraud, violence, harassment, serious bullying, intoxication at work, or a major breach of policy, you may need to suspend while you investigate.
This helps you:
- keep the workplace safe
- protect other staff and customers
- prevent interference with evidence or witnesses
Suspension is often considered alongside (or as part of) a broader disciplinary approach. If you’re already in a performance or misconduct pathway, it’s important to ensure your overall process is fair and consistent - the same principles that apply in Performance Management apply here too (clear concerns, chance to respond, genuine consideration).
2) Risk Of Interference With An Investigation
Even if the alleged conduct isn’t “dangerous”, suspension might be justified if the employee could:
- destroy or tamper with documents
- coach witnesses
- access confidential systems or information
- contact customers/suppliers in a way that creates risk
This is particularly relevant in small businesses, where staff often wear multiple hats and have broad system access.
3) Health And Safety Concerns
Sometimes suspension (or removal from duties) is really about safety. Under the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, you must take reasonably practicable steps to ensure health and safety at work.
If there’s a credible risk of harm - for example, aggressive behaviour, threats, or unsafe conduct - you may need to act quickly.
That said, even in safety situations, you should still aim to follow a fair process, consult where possible, and keep records of why you made the decision and what alternatives you considered.
4) Conflict Of Interest Or Integrity Issues
If you suspect the employee is acting against the business’s interests (for example, diverting work, dealing with competitors, or misusing confidential information), you might need to suspend while you clarify the facts.
This is also where strong internal policies help - for example, a Conflict Of Interest Policy can make expectations clearer and reduce ambiguity when issues arise.
When Suspension Is Usually Not Appropriate
As a general guide, suspension can be risky if:
- you’re using it as an automatic “first step” without assessing necessity
- it’s being used to punish or embarrass the employee
- there are workable alternatives (like temporary reassignment)
- you haven’t given the employee a chance to respond before suspending (unless urgency/safety makes that impractical)
The better approach is to treat suspension as a serious intervention - used when needed, but not as your default tool.
Is Employee Suspension Paid Or Unpaid?
This is one of the first questions employers ask - and it matters a lot, because getting it wrong can increase the risk of wage claims and personal grievances.
Suspension Is Commonly On Full Pay
In many NZ workplaces, suspension is commonly on full pay, especially where the employee is ready and willing to work but you are directing them not to attend.
Suspension without pay is generally higher risk. Whether you can do it (and whether it would be considered fair and reasonable) depends on factors like:
- whether the employment agreement (or a relevant policy incorporated into it) clearly provides for unpaid suspension in defined circumstances, and
- whether you’ve followed a fair process (including consultation where reasonably possible), and
- whether unpaid suspension is proportionate in the circumstances and consistent with good faith
Even if your agreement includes an unpaid suspension clause, it doesn’t mean you can automatically apply it. You still need to act fairly and reasonably in the circumstances, and carefully document why you’re taking that approach.
Be Careful With “Stand-Down” Language
Employers sometimes use words like “stand-down” or “sending them home” casually, but it’s better to be precise. “Stand-down” can be used in different contexts (including particular situations in employment law and industrial action), and using the wrong label can create confusion about what you’re doing and why.
If you’re directing an employee not to work while you investigate, clearly describe it as a suspension (and confirm whether it’s paid), rather than relying on informal terminology.
Can You Require The Employee To Take Leave Instead?
Sometimes employers consider using annual leave while matters are being looked into. This can get complicated quickly.
For example, annual leave is usually taken by agreement - and while an employer can direct an employee to take annual leave in certain circumstances, there are specific rules (including notice requirements under the Holidays Act 2003). Using annual leave in place of a fair suspension/disciplinary process can also backfire if it looks like you’re trying to avoid dealing with the underlying issue properly.
How Do You Suspend An Employee? A Best Practice Process For Small Businesses
Even when suspension is justified, the process is where many employers get into trouble.
Here’s a practical best practice approach you can adapt to your workplace. (The exact steps will depend on your employment agreement, policies, and the seriousness/urgency of the situation.)
Step 1: Check Your Employment Agreement And Policies
Before you say anything, check:
- Does the agreement have a suspension clause?
- Is suspension stated to be paid or unpaid?
- Are there any notice/consultation steps required?
- Do you have a disciplinary or investigation policy you need to follow?
If your agreements and policies are outdated (or copied from a template that doesn’t match how you actually operate), it’s a good time to fix that - ideally before a high-stakes issue arises.
Step 2: Identify The Reason Suspension Is Necessary (Not Just Helpful)
Ask yourself: Why can’t the employee remain at work while we investigate?
Good reasons might include:
- immediate risk to staff/customers
- risk of interference with evidence/witnesses
- risk to company property, money, or confidential information
- serious reputational risk in a customer-facing role (where alternative duties aren’t available)
Write this down. If your decision is challenged later, your contemporaneous notes can be very important.
Step 3: Consider Alternatives To Suspension
Decision-makers are often expected to consider whether there were less disruptive options, such as:
- temporary reassignment to other duties
- working from home
- removing system access while allowing work that doesn’t require access
- changing reporting lines (e.g. different supervisor)
- direction not to contact certain staff/clients during the investigation
Alternatives won’t always be practical in a small business - but showing you genuinely considered them can make your decision much more defensible.
Step 4: Meet With The Employee And Consult (Where Reasonably Possible)
Unless the situation is genuinely urgent or unsafe, best practice is to:
- tell the employee you’re considering suspension
- explain the reasons (at a high level, without prejudging outcomes)
- give them a chance to respond
- consider their response before making a final decision
This is part of acting in good faith and following fair process.
Tip: if you think the employee might become distressed or reactive, plan the meeting carefully. Choose a private space, have two managers present if possible, and keep your communication calm and factual.
Step 5: Confirm The Suspension In Writing
Your suspension letter/email should usually cover:
- that the employee is suspended (and the start date/time)
- whether it’s paid (and what happens with allowances/commission, if relevant)
- the reason suspension is necessary (brief and neutral)
- that the suspension is not a finding of wrongdoing
- expectations during suspension (availability, not contacting staff/clients, confidentiality)
- what happens next (investigation steps and indicative timeframe)
Be careful about broad “gag” instructions that stop the employee speaking to anyone at all - these can be unreasonable. It’s more common to set targeted, sensible boundaries (like not discussing the matter with colleagues to protect process integrity).
Step 6: Run A Prompt, Fair Investigation
A suspension shouldn’t drag on indefinitely. Once you suspend, you should move promptly through investigation steps, including:
- collecting relevant documents and system logs
- interviewing witnesses (fairly and consistently)
- providing the employee with the key allegations and giving them a chance to respond
In many workplaces, evidence gathering involves digital tools like CCTV or recorded calls. If that’s relevant to your business, make sure you understand your obligations and boundaries around workplace cameras and call recording before relying on that material in a disciplinary process.
Step 7: Review The Suspension As Things Change
Suspension isn’t always “set and forget”. As your investigation progresses, you should consider whether suspension is still necessary or whether conditions can be relaxed (for example, returning to duties with restricted access).
Regular check-ins (and written updates) can reduce frustration and uncertainty, and they also show that you’re acting reasonably.
What Are The Biggest Risks Of Employee Suspension (And How Do You Avoid Them)?
Suspension is one of those areas where good intentions aren’t enough - it’s the reasonableness of your decision and the fairness of your process that matter.
Here are common risks we see for small businesses, and how to manage them.
Risk 1: Unjustified Disadvantage Claims
If the employee argues the suspension wasn’t justified or was handled unfairly, they may raise a personal grievance for unjustified disadvantage.
How to reduce the risk:
- only suspend where necessary
- consult before suspending where reasonably possible
- keep the suspension as short as possible
- confirm everything in writing
Risk 2: Treating Suspension As A Shortcut To Dismissal
Suspension is not the same as termination. If you treat suspension as “we’ve basically decided”, it can undermine the whole disciplinary process.
How to reduce the risk:
- keep communications neutral (no conclusions before investigation)
- follow your disciplinary steps and allow genuine responses
- only decide outcomes after considering all information
If the matter does lead to dismissal, you still need to handle that separately and properly - the same principles apply as in any process to terminate an employee.
Risk 3: Pay And Wage Issues
Disputes about whether suspension should be paid can escalate quickly, particularly if the employee has regular shifts and relies on predictable income.
How to reduce the risk:
- check your agreement before acting
- treat paid suspension as the usual default unless you have clear contractual grounds and a fair basis not to
- be clear about what happens with commissions/allowances and the practicalities of the employee being “ready and willing” to work
Risk 4: Privacy Complaints During The Investigation
Suspensions often come with investigations, and investigations often involve sensitive personal information (messages, emails, CCTV footage, complaints from colleagues, medical information, etc.). Under the Privacy Act 2020, you generally need to collect and handle personal information in a fair and lawful way, and only for legitimate purposes.
How to reduce the risk:
- only access what you genuinely need
- limit who in the business sees investigation material
- store information securely
- avoid “office gossip” by reminding managers about confidentiality
Risk 5: Workplace Culture Fallout
Even a well-run suspension can unsettle a small team. People may fill in the gaps with rumours, anxiety, and assumptions - which can cause longer-term issues.
How to reduce the risk:
- plan how you’ll communicate internally (without oversharing)
- make sure managers stick to consistent messaging
- focus on safety and fairness rather than blame
Handled well, a suspension can protect your team and the integrity of the process. Handled poorly, it can create a second problem on top of the first one.
Key Takeaways
- Employee suspension should be used carefully and usually only where it’s reasonably necessary (not simply convenient).
- In many cases, suspension will be paid - unpaid suspension is higher risk and often depends on what your employment agreement allows and whether it’s fair and reasonable in the circumstances.
- Before suspending, you should generally check the employment agreement, identify why suspension is required, and consider alternatives like reassignment or restricted duties.
- A fair process typically includes consulting with the employee (where reasonably possible), confirming the decision in writing, and running a prompt investigation.
- Common legal risks include personal grievances for unjustified disadvantage, pay disputes, and privacy issues during investigations - good documentation and consistent communication help reduce these risks.
- If you’re unsure, getting tailored legal advice early can help you avoid mistakes that are difficult (and costly) to unwind later.
If you’d like help managing an employee suspension, investigating misconduct, or updating your employment documents so you’re protected from day one, you can reach us at 0800 002 184 or team@sprintlaw.co.nz for a free, no-obligations chat.


